Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZORNIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 3, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 14+P1-3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general Stand for election) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 - General prohibition of discrimination ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ZORNIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009.

  The majority decided to follow the approach adopted in the Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, (nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009).

• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Karanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 39462/03, § 28, 20 November 2007; Colic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos.
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  "No objective and reasonable justification" means that the distinction in issue does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or that there is not a "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised" (see, among many authorities, Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 81, ECHR 2009).

 
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  46113/99 et al., ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

  GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  60041/08 and 60054/08, § 106, ECHR 2010 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  As to the problem of the second chamber, it is impossible to disagree with the view reiterated in the Sejdic and Finci judgment (paragraph 40), to the effect that "Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 was carefully drafted so as to avoid terms which could be interpreted as an absolute obligation to hold elections for both chambers in each and every bicameral system (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, § 53, Series A no. 113)".
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 3681/06

  This means, amongst other things, that the Court must take realistic account not only of the existence of formal remedies in the legal system of the Contracting Party concerned but also of the general legal and political context in which they operate as well as the personal circumstances of the applicant (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 69, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 77, ECHR 1999 V).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 13.07.2016 - C-188/15

  Nach Auffassung von Generalanwältin Sharpston stellt eine Unternehmenspraxis, …

  63 - Vgl. z. B. Urteile vom 22. Dezember 2009, Sejdic und Finci/Bosnien und Herzegowina (CE:ECHR:2009:1222JUD002799606), und vom 15. Juli 2014, Zornic/Bosnien und Herzegowina (CE:ECHR:2014:0715JUD000368106).
• EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

  VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  This means amongst other things that it must take realistic account not only of the existence of formal remedies in the legal system of the Contracting Party concerned but also of the general legal and political context in which they operate as well as the personal circumstances of the applicants (see Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3681/06, § 20, 15 July 2014).
• EGMR, 29.08.2023 - 43651/22

  KOVACEVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Following the judgments of this Court in Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina ([GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009), Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 3681/06, 15 July 2014) and Pilav v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 41939/07, 9 June 2016), the Constitutional Court has started declaring complaints about the ethnic composition of the House of Peoples and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina inadmissible because the matter has already been examined.

  However, in view of the Constitutional Court's approach to complaints about the legal provisions excluding persons who do not declare affiliation with "constituent peoples" from public functions (see paragraphs 16-18 above), the Court agrees with the applicant that the remedies to which the Government referred were bound to fail in respect of this complaint (see Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3681/06, § 21, 15 July 2014).

  These complaints are different from those raised by the applicants in Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC] (nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, 22 December 2009), Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 3681/06, 15 July 2014), ? laku v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 56666/12, 26 May 2016), Pilav v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 41939/07, 9 June 2016) and Pudaric v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 55799/18, 8 December 2020), where the applicants had been potential candidates and successfully complained about restrictions on their right to stand for election.

 
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 414/11

  KONGRESNA NARODNA STRANKA AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  The relevant domestic law and practice and international documents were outlined in Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina ([GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, ECHR 2009) and Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 3681/06, 15 July 2014).
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 50408/15

  VERES AND KOCJANCIC v. SLOVENIA

  Discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in similar situations (see Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 81, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Sejdic and Finci, cited above, § 42; and Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3681/06, § 26, 15 July 2014).
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 76807/11

  KONSTANTINOU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  27996/06 and 34836/06, § 42, ECHR 2009; and Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3681/06, § 26, 15 July 2014).
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 36522/15

  LE LIEVRE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  27996/06 and 34836/06, § 42, ECHR 2009; and Zornic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3681/06, § 26, 15 July 2014).