Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,30282) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GUDURIC v. SERBIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (6)
- EGMR, 16.10.2003 - 76737/01
ANDREYEVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court has previously accepted that the late applicants" close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention provided they have a sufficient interest in so doing (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Mihailov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52367/99, 9 September 2004; Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 26, 8 November 2007; and Grosz v. France (dec.), no. 14717/06, 16 June 2009). - EGMR, 21.07.2005 - 52367/99
MIHAILOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court has previously accepted that the late applicants" close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention provided they have a sufficient interest in so doing (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Mihailov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52367/99, 9 September 2004; Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 26, 8 November 2007; and Grosz v. France (dec.), no. 14717/06, 16 June 2009). - EGMR, 30.10.2007 - 17556/05
MARCIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court therefore considers that they have a legitimate interest in pursuing the application and, thus, have the requisite locus standi under Article 34 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Marcic and Others v. Serbia, no. 17556/05, § 39, 30 October 2007).
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 14818/02
STOJKOVIC v.
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court has previously accepted that the late applicants" close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention provided they have a sufficient interest in so doing (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Mihailov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52367/99, 9 September 2004; Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 26, 8 November 2007; and Grosz v. France (dec.), no. 14717/06, 16 June 2009). - EGMR, 16.06.2009 - 14717/06
GROSZ c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court has previously accepted that the late applicants" close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention provided they have a sufficient interest in so doing (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Mihailov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52367/99, 9 September 2004; Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 26, 8 November 2007; and Grosz v. France (dec.), no. 14717/06, 16 June 2009). - EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87
RAIMONDO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 18372/07
The Court has previously accepted that the late applicants" close relatives could maintain applications with complaints concerning various aspects of Article 6 of the Convention provided they have a sufficient interest in so doing (see Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A; Andreyeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 76737/01, 16 October 2003; Mihailov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 52367/99, 9 September 2004; Stojkovic v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 14818/02, § 26, 8 November 2007; and Grosz v. France (dec.), no. 14717/06, 16 June 2009).