Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article ...
Wird zitiert von ... (29) Neu Zitiert selbst (23)
- EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
That right is of primary importance in a "democratic society" within the meaning of the Convention (see De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12, and Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 37, Series A no. 33). - EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
However, if a failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation is manifest or is sufficiently brought to the authorities" attention in some other way, the authorities must take steps to ensure that the accused effectively enjoys the right to legal assistance (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33-37, Series A no. 37, and Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 65, Series A no. 168). - EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82
BOZANO v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...).
- EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 36391/02
Wirksamkeitsverpflichtete Konventionsauslegung; Recht auf konkreten und wirksamen …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Even where compelling reasons may exceptionally justify denial of access to a lawyer, such restriction - whatever its justification - must not unduly prejudice the rights of the accused under Article 6 (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 55, ECHR 2008). - EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04
KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Compliance with national law is not, however, sufficient: Article 5 § 1 requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be in keeping with the purpose of protecting the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008-...). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
However, if a failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation is manifest or is sufficiently brought to the authorities" attention in some other way, the authorities must take steps to ensure that the accused effectively enjoys the right to legal assistance (see Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, §§ 33-37, Series A no. 37, and Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, § 65, Series A no. 168). - EGMR, 09.04.1984 - 8966/80
GODDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
Moreover, where it is clear that the lawyer representing the accused before the domestic court has not had the time and facilities to organise a proper defence, the court should take positive measures to ensure that the lawyer is given an opportunity to fulfil his obligations in the best possible conditions (see, mutatis mutandis, Goddi v. Italy, 9 April 1984, § 31, Series A no. 76). - EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96
Dieter Krombach
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 60259/11
The Court reiterates that, although not absolute, the right of everyone charged with a criminal offence to be effectively defended by a lawyer, assigned officially if need be, is one of the fundamental features of a fair trial (see Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 89, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 3653/05
ASADBEYLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88
POITRIMOL c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 20652/92
DJAVIT AN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06
HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 40721/08
FÁBER v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 28.08.1991 - 12151/86
F.C.B. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04
SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 61821/00
ZILIBERBERG v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 21613/07
KASPAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04
BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE
- EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 26163/22
AHMADLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015, Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87,.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 23689/14
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015, Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 3346/17
BALAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
6 (1) - insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 27390/17
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-87, 15 October 2015, and Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 39472/16
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
In the leading cases of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015, Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.Unfairness of the administrative offence proceedings taken as a whole, in particular due to insufficient or manifestly unreasonable justification of court decisions and lack of own choice of legal assistance (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 83-94, 15 October 2015; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
- EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 17184/18
A AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
The Court has established in a number of cases its practice concerning the complaints raised in the present applications (see, for example, Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 97-110, 15 October 2015, concerning Article 5; Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 72508/13
MERABISHVILI c. GÉORGIE
On the other hand, if there is some manifest irregularity which, seen in context, shows that a deprivation of liberty was chiefly meant for an ulterior purpose - the applicants are detained on vague or fabricated charges to prevent or punish their participation in rallies (see Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, §§ 52-57, 21 June 2011; Hakobyan and Others v. Armenia, no. 34320/04, § 123, 10 April 2012; Nemtsov, cited above, § 103; Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, §§ 107-08, 15 October 2015; Kasparov, cited above, §§ 50-56; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 25809/17
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The courts justified his arrest and conviction by the mere reference to the "unlawfulness" of the march, without assessing whether it had been possible to ensure that the march proceed peacefully while minimising the disruption of movement of passers-by, road users and public service workers (see, mutatis mutandis, Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, § 60, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 2515/11
JAFARZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 14. A summary of the relevant provisions concerning administrative proceedings is provided in the case of Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, §§ 32-38, 15 October 2015).Referring to its findings in Asadbeyli and Others v. Azerbaijan (nos. 3653/05 and 5 others, 11 December 2012), the Court considers that the proceedings in the present case should be classified as determining a criminal charge against the applicant, even though they are characterised as "administrative" under Azerbaijani legislation (see Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 60259/11, § 70, 15 October 2015; Ziliberberg v. Moldova, no. 61821/00, §§ 30-35, 1 February 2005, and Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, §§ 95-98, ECHR 2006-III).
- EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 14962/15
ISAGOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the right to liberty, right to fair trial and freedom of expression (see, for example, Hasanov and Majidli v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9626/14 and 9717/14, 7 October 2021; Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 67360/11 and 2 others, 11 February 2016; and Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259/11, 15 October 2015). - EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 6307/18
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 28232/22
FIGURKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 42513/19
GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 57347/19
ABDULLAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 59863/18
ISMAYILOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 38567/19
NADIRLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 8640/20
MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 9664/20
SAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 47915/09
DADASHOV AND HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 38931/20
HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 57739/18
GASIMLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 31.08.2023 - 19071/18
BABAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 31.08.2023 - 40990/18
ASHUROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 52286/11
AHMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 71750/13
BABAYEV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 28.04.2022 - 59202/12
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 64733/09
ELECTION MONITORING CENTRE AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 53205/17 (anhängig)
ORUJOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 24219/16
KARIMOV ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN