Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,13699
EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,13699)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.11.2011 - 39900/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,13699)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. November 2011 - 39900/06 (https://dejure.org/2011,13699)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,13699) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Kurzfassungen/Presse

  • internet-law.de (Kurzinformation)

    Journalistin darf Anwalt nicht Nachlässigkeit vorwerfen

Besprechungen u.ä.

  • lehofer.at (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

    Nachlässige Reporterin darf Rechtsanwalt nicht (fälschlich) Nachlässigkeit vorwerfen

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (16)

  • EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 36207/03

    RUMYANA IVANOVA v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    21279/02 and 36448/02, § 67, ECHR 2007-...; Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 36207/03, § 61, 14 February 2008 and Weigt v. Poland (dec.), no. 74232/01, 11 October 2005).

    The Court would point out in that connection that according to its case-law, the more serious an allegation is, the more solid its factual basis should be (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre, § 101; Pedersen and Baadsgaard, § 78 in fine; cited above, and Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 36207/03, § 64, 14 February 2008).

  • EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

    TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    While the amount was significant, the pecuniary impact of the interference complained of cannot be said to have been excessive (contrast Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, §§ 46-51, Series A no. 316-B, mutatis mutandis).
  • EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

    FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    By reason of these "duties and responsibilities", the safeguard afforded by Article 10 to journalists in relation to reporting on issues of general interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see, for example, Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 39, Reports 1996-II; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999-I; Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 78, ECHR 2004-XI; Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 31457/96

    NEWS VERLAGS GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    Not only do the media have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public has a right to receive them (see News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, §§ 55-56, ECHR 2000-I; Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 50, Reports 1997-V; and Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438/04, § 49, 16 April 2009).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

    FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    Where a statement amounts to a value judgment, the proportionality of the interference may depend on whether there exists a sufficient factual basis for the impugned statement, since even a value judgment without any factual basis to support it may be excessive (see De Haes and Gijsels, cited above, § 47, and Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 76, ECHR 2001-VIII).
  • EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

    CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    This determination must be based on the following general principles emerging from the Court's case-law (see, among other authorities, CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 88-91, ECHR 2004-XI; Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, § 54, 19 April 2011, with further references):.
  • EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 75955/01

    SOKOLOWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    The approach taken by the courts is therefore compatible with freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention (contrast Sokolowski v. Poland, no. 75955/01, § 46, 29 March 2005; Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, §§ 29 and 30, 5 October 2006; and Karman v. Russia, no. 29372/02, §§ 42 and 43, 14 December 2006).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 74232/01

    WEIGT v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    21279/02 and 36448/02, § 67, ECHR 2007-...; Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 36207/03, § 61, 14 February 2008 and Weigt v. Poland (dec.), no. 74232/01, 11 October 2005).
  • EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 33352/02

    KELLER v. HUNGARY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    They carried out a careful balancing exercise between the interests involved (compare and contrast Keller v. Hungary (dec.), no. 33352/02, 4 April 2006 and Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 52, ECHR 2007-...).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 14881/03

    ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 39900/06
    The approach taken by the courts is therefore compatible with freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention (contrast Sokolowski v. Poland, no. 75955/01, § 46, 29 March 2005; Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, §§ 29 and 30, 5 October 2006; and Karman v. Russia, no. 29372/02, §§ 42 and 43, 14 December 2006).
  • EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

    LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 16.04.2009 - 34438/04

    EGELAND AND HANSEID v. NORWAY

  • EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 22385/03

    KASABOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

    OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

    JERSILD v. DENMARK

  • EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 29372/02

    KARMAN v. RUSSIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht