Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 9536/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,39030) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
FEDORIN v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.02.2005 - 45100/98
PANCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 9536/10
However, the Court has repeatedly held that, although the severity of the sentence faced is a relevant element in assessing the risk of an accused absconding or reoffending, the need to continue the deprivation of liberty cannot be assessed from a purely abstract point of view, taking into consideration only the gravity of the offence (see Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 102, 8 February 2005; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 180, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Chumakov v. Russia, no. 41794/04, § 159, 24 April 2012). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 9536/10
However, the Court has repeatedly held that, although the severity of the sentence faced is a relevant element in assessing the risk of an accused absconding or reoffending, the need to continue the deprivation of liberty cannot be assessed from a purely abstract point of view, taking into consideration only the gravity of the offence (see Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 102, 8 February 2005; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 180, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Chumakov v. Russia, no. 41794/04, § 159, 24 April 2012). - EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 41794/04
CHUMAKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 9536/10
However, the Court has repeatedly held that, although the severity of the sentence faced is a relevant element in assessing the risk of an accused absconding or reoffending, the need to continue the deprivation of liberty cannot be assessed from a purely abstract point of view, taking into consideration only the gravity of the offence (see Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 102, 8 February 2005; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 180, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); and Chumakov v. Russia, no. 41794/04, § 159, 24 April 2012).