Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,37916
EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,37916)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.12.2015 - 56080/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,37916)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Dezember 2015 - 56080/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,37916)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37916) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL

    Violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2 - Obligations positives;Article 2-1 - Vie);Violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête efficace) (Volet procédural);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL

    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - ...

Sonstiges (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (20)

  • EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

    CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    The Court also observes that, under the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention, States have a positive obligation to set up an effective independent judicial system so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or the private sector, can be determined and those responsible made accountable (see Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V, and Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I).

    Even assuming that there had been a causal relationship, this is not enough to find a violation in the light of the cases cited above (see Byrzykowski; Erikson; and Powell, all cited above, and Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 48, ECHR 2002-I).

  • EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 45305/99

    POWELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    The Court also observes that, under the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention, States have a positive obligation to set up an effective independent judicial system so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or the private sector, can be determined and those responsible made accountable (see Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V, and Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 49, ECHR 2002-I).

    We should add that in the case-law the French "mauvaise" coordination means negligent (see the English version of Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305/99, ECHR 2000-V, and its precedential progeny including Byrzykowski).

  • EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 13423/09

    MEHMET SENTÜRK ET BEKIR SENTÜRK c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    It therefore finds that there has been a violation of the substantive aspect of Article 2 of the Convention (see, in this connection and mutatis mutandis, Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey, no. 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013, and Asiye Genç v. Turkey, no. 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015).

    The Court relies, mutatis mutandis, on Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey (no. 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013) and Asiye Genç v. Turkey (no. 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015).

     
  • EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 24109/07

    ASIYE GENÇ c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    It therefore finds that there has been a violation of the substantive aspect of Article 2 of the Convention (see, in this connection and mutatis mutandis, Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey, no. 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013, and Asiye Genç v. Turkey, no. 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015).

    The Court relies, mutatis mutandis, on Mehmet Sentürk and Bekir Sentürk v. Turkey (no. 13423/09, § 97, ECHR 2013) and Asiye Genç v. Turkey (no. 24109/07, § 82, 27 January 2015).

  • EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35887/11

    DE SANTIS ET OLANDA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    This is particularly true in relation to scientific expert assessments, which by definition call for specific and detailed knowledge of the subject (see, mutatis mutandis, Erikson, cited above; Pockajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004; and De Santis and Olanda v. Italy (dec.), no. 35887/11, § 45, 9 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 37703/97

    Verantwortung des Staates für Mord durch beurlaubte Gefangene; Verpflichtung des …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    If the infringement of the right to life or to personal integrity is not caused intentionally, this obligation does not necessarily require the provision of a criminal-law remedy in every case (see Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2002-VIII).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

    Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII, and Lazzarini and Ghiacci v. Italy (dec.), no. 53749/00, 7 November 2002).
  • EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 53749/00

    LAZZARINI et GHIACCI contre l'ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII, and Lazzarini and Ghiacci v. Italy (dec.), no. 53749/00, 7 November 2002).
  • EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 76774/01

    POCKAJEVS c. LETTONIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    This is particularly true in relation to scientific expert assessments, which by definition call for specific and detailed knowledge of the subject (see, mutatis mutandis, Erikson, cited above; Pockajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774/01, 21 October 2004; and De Santis and Olanda v. Italy (dec.), no. 35887/11, § 45, 9 July 2013).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 41773/98

    SCAVUZZO-HAGER ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 56080/13
    The Court observes that it has previously examined the issue of the procedural obligations arising out of Article 2 separately from that of compliance with the substantive obligation and, where appropriate, has found a separate violation of the procedural aspect of Article 2 (see, for instance, Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, §§ 74-78 and §§ 86-92, Reports 1998-I; McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 116-61, ECHR 2001-III; Scavuzzo-Hager and Others v. Switzerland, no. 41773/98, §§ 53-69 and §§ 80-86, 7 February 2006; and Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, §§ 286-89 and §§ 323-57, ECHR 2007-II).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 75725/01

    TROCELLIER v. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 4864/05

    OYAL v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06

    NENCHEVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  • EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 45721/09

    SÜLEYMAN EGE c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 13904/07

    KUDRA v. CROATIA

  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 47039/11

    HRISTOZOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 45076/05

    ARSKAYA v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 02.04.2014 - 18968/07

    V.C. ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA SLOVAQUIE

  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht