Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09, 17645/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,43201) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LAZAREV AND BEKTASHYANTS v. RUSSIA
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 33803/04
MIKHALCHUK c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09
The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention in Russia (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 104-121 ECHR 2002 VI), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of an excessively lengthy pre-trial detention without proper justification in more than a hundred cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 169 - 189; ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Dolgova v. Russia, no. 11886/05, §§ 32 - 50, 2 March 2006; Mikhalchuk v. Russia, no. 33803/04, §§ 40 - 59, 23 April 2015). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02
KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09
The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention in Russia (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 104-121 ECHR 2002 VI), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of an excessively lengthy pre-trial detention without proper justification in more than a hundred cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 169 - 189; ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Dolgova v. Russia, no. 11886/05, §§ 32 - 50, 2 March 2006; Mikhalchuk v. Russia, no. 33803/04, §§ 40 - 59, 23 April 2015). - EGMR, 02.03.2006 - 11886/05
DOLGOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 59813/09
The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention in Russia (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 104-121 ECHR 2002 VI), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of an excessively lengthy pre-trial detention without proper justification in more than a hundred cases against Russia (see, for example, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 169 - 189; ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Dolgova v. Russia, no. 11886/05, §§ 32 - 50, 2 March 2006; Mikhalchuk v. Russia, no. 33803/04, §§ 40 - 59, 23 April 2015).