Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 34830/18 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,52172) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PULS v. GERMANY
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PULS v. GERMANY
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 34830/18
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 34830/18
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Germany, its practice concerning the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State as regards the determination of "civil rights and obligations" within a "reasonable time" (see, among many others, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, ECHR 2006-VII; more recently, Fröhlich v. Germany, no. 16741/16, 24 January 2019). - EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 16741/16
JOHANNA FRÖHLICH v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 34830/18
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Germany, its practice concerning the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State as regards the determination of "civil rights and obligations" within a "reasonable time" (see, among many others, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, ECHR 2006-VII; more recently, Fröhlich v. Germany, no. 16741/16, 24 January 2019). - EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 68919/10
PETER v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 34830/18
The Court has also dealt with applications concerning the Act on Protracted Court Proceedings and Criminal Investigations (see for example, Kuppinger v. Germany, no. 62198/11, §§ 139 et seq., 15 January 2015; Peter v. Germany (dec.), no. 68919/10, §§ 54 et seq., 4 September 2014).