Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.01.2003 - 62763/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,50177) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VERLAGSGRUPPE NEWS GMBH v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 10 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.01.2003 - 62763/00
- EGMR, 23.10.2003 - 62763/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85
Oberschlick ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2003 - 62763/00
Finally, the applicant company referred to the Court's Oberschlick v. Austria judgment (no.1) of 23 May 1991 (Series A no. 204, p. 26, § 59), in which the Court found that the limits of acceptable criticism are wider with regard to a politician acting in his public capacity than in relation to a private individual.Referring to the Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1) judgment of 23 May 1991 (Series A no. 204), it found that the photomontage on the front page had to be considered separately from the reports in the magazine as, in any case, its impact had overlaid all potential factual references.
- EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87
SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2003 - 62763/00
It is true that the presumption of innocence is to be observed not only by criminal courts trying cases, but also by other authorities, including courts other than those which are competent to determine a criminal charge (see Sekanina v. Austria, Commission's Report of 20 May 1992, Decisions and Reports, Series A no. 266, p. 20, § 36; Hammerstein v. the Netherlands, no 34973/97, Commission decision of 1 July 1998, unpublished).