Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WOLF v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, § 62, 21 September 2004).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 152 et seq., ECHR 2000-IV; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty laid down in Article 5 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 152 et seq., ECHR 2000-IV; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 21.09.2004 - 10675/02

  KUSMIEREK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, § 62, 21 September 2004).
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, § 84; Kudla, cited above, § 111).

• EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 7258/12

  WASIAK c. POLOGNE

  En principe, il n'est pas exigé d'un requérant qu'il renouvelle un recours antérieurement exercé pour épuiser les voies de recours internes (Granger c. Royaume-Uni (no 11932/86, rapport de la Commission du 9 mai 1988, Décisions et rapports (31)), Wolf c. Pologne, nos 15667/03 et 2929/04, § 62, 16 avril 2007).
• EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 18120/10
  Selbst wenn die besonderen Umstände der Sache eine Verlängerung der Untersuchungshaft über den entsprechend der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs im Allgemeinen akzeptierten Zeitraum hinaus erforderten, bedürfte es besonders gewichtiger Gründe, um weitere Verlängerungen der Untersuchungshaft des Beschwerdeführers zu rechtfertigen (siehe Wolf ./. Polen, Individualbeschwerde Nrn. 15667/03 und 2929/04, Rdnr. 90, 16. Januar 2007).