Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,49998) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOGDANOWICZ v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
No violation of Art. 5-3 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03
The Court's accepts the Government's view and considers that the applicant did not exhaust domestic remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, having regard to the effectiveness of the remedy under the 2004 Act in the circumstances of cases such as the applicant's (see, Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005).[1] For a more detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005.
- EGMR, 09.12.2015 - 30210/96
KUDLA ET 204 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03
[1] For a more detailed presentation of the relevant domestic law see Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005; Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005. - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03
Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV, § 153). - EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
W. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 38872/03
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, the W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30).