Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,263) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LISOVAIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LISOVOI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09
The compatibility of a search warrant with these requirements has always been a matter of concern for the Court (see, among many other authorities, Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 37, Series A no. 251-B; Van Rossem v. Belgium, no. 41872/98, § 45, 9 December 2004; Smirnov v. Russia, no. 71362/01, § 47, 7 June 2007; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, §§ 40 and 41, 22 May 2008). - EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 36659/04
IONESCU c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09
Thus, the absence of any such disadvantage can be based on criteria such as the financial impact of the matter in dispute or the importance of the case for the applicant (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.) no. 36659/04, § 34, 1 June 2010; Rinck v. France (dec.), no. 18774/09, 19 October 2010; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011). - EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05
KOROLEV c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09
The severity of a violation should be assessed taking account of both the applicant's subjective perceptions and what is objectively at stake in a particular case (see Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010). - EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 52036/09
KIOUSI c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09
Thus, the absence of any such disadvantage can be based on criteria such as the financial impact of the matter in dispute or the importance of the case for the applicant (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.) no. 36659/04, § 34, 1 June 2010; Rinck v. France (dec.), no. 18774/09, 19 October 2010; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011). - EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 18774/09
RINCK c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 16908/09
Thus, the absence of any such disadvantage can be based on criteria such as the financial impact of the matter in dispute or the importance of the case for the applicant (see Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.) no. 36659/04, § 34, 1 June 2010; Rinck v. France (dec.), no. 18774/09, 19 October 2010; and Kiousi v. Greece (dec.), no. 52036/09, 20 September 2011).