Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 37212/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,54952) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WALKER v. UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 14 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 37212/02
- EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 37212/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21987/93
AKSOY c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 37212/02
Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (for example, Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, no. 21893/93, §§ 65-67, ECHR 1996-IV; Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1996-VI). - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 37212/02
The Court notes that there is no question in this case that the authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and afforded redress (Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66) such as would render the applicant no longer a victim of any alleged breach of his rights.