Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FRANSSON and FRANSSON v. SWEDEN

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6 MRK
  Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02
• EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 8719/02

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 23.11.2000 - 25701/94

  Konstantin II.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  These rules are not "distinct" in the sense of being unconnected: the second and third rules, which are concerned with particular instances of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property, are to be construed in the light of the general principle laid down in the first rule (see, for example, Case of the former King of Greece and others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  However, the Court will leave a wide margin of appreciation to the State to decide the appropriate compensation and will respect the domestic court's judgment on this issue unless that judgment was manifestly without reasonable foundation (see, among other authorities, Lithgow and others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, §§ 120 and 122; Beyeler v. Italy, [GC], no. 33202/96, §§ 111 and 114, ECHR 2000-I; and Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 73).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  The question whether or not that Article requires the provision of legal representation to an individual litigant will depend upon the specific circumstances of the case and, in particular, upon whether the individual would be able to present his case properly and satisfactorily without the assistance of a lawyer (see Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, §§ 26-28).

 
• EGMR, 22.09.1994 - 13616/88

  HENTRICH v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  These proceedings should be governed by basic procedural guarantees (see, for example, AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, § 55; and Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, § 49).
• EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80

  AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  These proceedings should be governed by basic procedural guarantees (see, for example, AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108, p. 19, § 55; and Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 21, § 49).
• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  However, the Court will leave a wide margin of appreciation to the State to decide the appropriate compensation and will respect the domestic court's judgment on this issue unless that judgment was manifestly without reasonable foundation (see, among other authorities, Lithgow and others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, §§ 120 and 122; Beyeler v. Italy, [GC], no. 33202/96, §§ 111 and 114, ECHR 2000-I; and Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 73).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 8719/02

  However, the claim to have the legal costs covered by the opposite party cannot, in absence of any judgment or decision in favour of this claim, be considered as sufficiently established and enforceable as to be considered a "possession" (cf. Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 59).