Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ELOMAA v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 25624/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent and presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seeks to prove the case against the accused without resorting to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see, for example, Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, §§ 68-69, Reports 1996-VI; Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-IX; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94-117, ECHR 2006-IX; and O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, §§ 53-63, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  Their aim is to provide an accused person with protection against improper compulsion by the authorities and thus to avoid miscarriages of justice and secure the aims of Article 6 (see, among other authorities, John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, § 45, Reports 1996-I; and Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 92, 10 March 2009).
• EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 48539/99

  Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Umgehungsschutz; Schweigerecht; materieller / …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent and presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seeks to prove the case against the accused without resorting to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see, for example, Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, §§ 68-69, Reports 1996-VI; Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-IX; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94-117, ECHR 2006-IX; and O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, §§ 53-63, ECHR 2007-...).

 
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  The Court reiterates at the outset that in proceedings originating in an individual application it has to confine itself, as far as possible, to an examination of the concrete case before it (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 35, Series A no. 62).
• EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15809/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Kriterien für eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent and presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seeks to prove the case against the accused without resorting to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see, for example, Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, §§ 68-69, Reports 1996-VI; Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-IX; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94-117, ECHR 2006-IX; and O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, §§ 53-63, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent and presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seeks to prove the case against the accused without resorting to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see, for example, Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, §§ 68-69, Reports 1996-VI; Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 44, ECHR 2002-IX; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94-117, ECHR 2006-IX; and O"Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809/02 and 25624/02, §§ 53-63, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04

  In the Government's view, the applicant's case was thus comparable to the case of Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.) (no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII), where the Court found the applicant's complaint inadmissible.

• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 56936/13

  EKLUND v. FINLAND

  In this respect, the applicant's case is similar to the cases of Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.) (no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII) and Elomaa v. Finland (dec.), no. 37670/04, 16 March 2010, where the Court found that the applicant's subsequent conviction for the offence of making a false declaration of his assets to the tax authority was not an example of forced self-incrimination, but the result of the offence itself.