Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LINGURAR v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LINGURAR v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 40355/11

  BOACA ET AUTRES ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.04.2019 - 48474/14

  The relevant international material concerning the situation of Roma in Romania is described in Boaca and Others v. Romania (no. 40355/11, §§ 35-40, 12 January 2016).

  The Court refers to the general principles set out in its case-law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment and the requirement of an effective investigation into such allegations, as enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Boaca and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, §§ 66-67, 74-75 and 81-84, 12 January 2016; and Samachisa v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 59-64, 16 July 2015).

• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  SAMACHISA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.04.2019 - 48474/14

  The Court refers to the general principles set out in its case-law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment and the requirement of an effective investigation into such allegations, as enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Boaca and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, §§ 66-67, 74-75 and 81-84, 12 January 2016; and Samachisa v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 59-64, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.04.2019 - 48474/14

  Being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 126, ECHR 2018), the Court considers that the applicant's complaints should be examined only from the standpoint of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention, which read as follows:.

• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18

  WA BAILE c. SUISSE

  Elle se réfère également à l'arrêt Lingurar c. Roumanie ((comité), no 48474/14, § 76, 16 avril 2019) par lequel, indique-t-elle, la Cour a condamné sous l'angle des articles 3 et 14 le profilage ethnique de membres de la communauté rom opéré par la police, laquelle associait automatiquement l'appartenance à cette communauté à un comportement criminel.
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 13326/18

  PÂRVU v. ROMANIA

  Complementary general measures taken by the Romanian authorities to improve the effectiveness of criminal investigations, court proceedings and domestic remedies were under consideration during the above-mentioned meeting, in which Ministers' Deputies also examined Lingurar v. Romania (Application No. 48474/14) (CM/Notes/1406/H46-22):.
• EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 31016/17

  MEMEDOV v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  From the material available, the Court also does not find any evidence that the police raid, which was a response to the violent reaction of the local residents, was influenced by the residents" Roma origin (see, conversely, Lingurar v. Romania [Committee], no. 48474/14, §§ 75 and 76, 16 April 2019).