Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,15153) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PADLEWSKI v. AUSTRIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
- EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 11553/11
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 513/05
SCHMIDT v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the Court's case-law (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 48-49, 12 June 2003; Schmidt v. Austria, no. 513/05, § 24-29, 17 July 2008; Kincses v. Hungary, no. 66232/10, § 44-50, 27 January 2015; and Gollner v. Austria, no. 49455/99, § 24-25, 17 January 2002), the Court finds that the overall duration of the proceedings exceeded a "reasonable time". - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 49455/99
GOLLNER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the Court's case-law (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 48-49, 12 June 2003; Schmidt v. Austria, no. 513/05, § 24-29, 17 July 2008; Kincses v. Hungary, no. 66232/10, § 44-50, 27 January 2015; and Gollner v. Austria, no. 49455/99, § 24-25, 17 January 2002), the Court finds that the overall duration of the proceedings exceeded a "reasonable time". - EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 60553/00
MALEK v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the Court's case-law (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 48-49, 12 June 2003; Schmidt v. Austria, no. 513/05, § 24-29, 17 July 2008; Kincses v. Hungary, no. 66232/10, § 44-50, 27 January 2015; and Gollner v. Austria, no. 49455/99, § 24-25, 17 January 2002), the Court finds that the overall duration of the proceedings exceeded a "reasonable time". - EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 66232/10
KINCSES v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11553/11
Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the Court's case-law (see, for example and mutatis mutandis, Malek v. Austria, no. 60553/00, § 48-49, 12 June 2003; Schmidt v. Austria, no. 513/05, § 24-29, 17 July 2008; Kincses v. Hungary, no. 66232/10, § 44-50, 27 January 2015; and Gollner v. Austria, no. 49455/99, § 24-25, 17 January 2002), the Court finds that the overall duration of the proceedings exceeded a "reasonable time".