Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2019,12585
EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,12585)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16.05.2019 - 41203/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,12585)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16. Mai 2019 - 41203/16 (https://dejure.org/2019,12585)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,12585) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    LOGVINENKO v. UKRAINE

    Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Inhuman treatment);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06

    POKHLEBIN v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, and Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references) and that â?? where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition â?? supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09

    GORBULYA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, and Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references) and that â?? where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition â?? supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 22.10.2015 - 40512/13

    SERGEY ANTONOV v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 103-05, ECHR 2005-II (extracts), and Sergey Antonov v. Ukraine, no. 40512/13, §§ 76-90, 22 October 2015).
  • EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 44694/13

    KOLESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, and Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references) and that â?? where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition â?? supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06

    SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15

    KONOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2019 - 41203/16
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht