Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 46551/06 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MANOLE ET « LES CULTIVATEURS DIRECTS DE ROUMANIE » c. ROUMANIE
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae) Non-violation de l'article 11 - Liberté de réunion et d'association (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MANOLE AND \
[DEU] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MANOLE AND \
[TUR] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2)
- EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 29582/09
YAKUT REPUBLICAN TRADE-UNION FEDERATION v. RUSSIA
Although the Convention does not precisely define the concept of "trade union" beyond a general indication that it is an association formed for the purpose of defending the interests of its members, most of the cases considered by the Court have concerned employees and, more broadly, persons in an "employment relationship" (see Manole and "Romanian Farmers Direct" v. Romania, no. 46551/06, § 59, 16 June 2015).As acknowledged by the majority, Article 11 § 2 of the Convention does not exclude any occupational group from the scope of that provision (see paragraph 29 of the judgment); at most, the national authorities are entitled to impose "lawful restrictions" on certain of their employees in accordance with Article 11 § 2 (see Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun", cited above, § 145; Manole and "Romanian Farmers Direct" v. Romania, no. 46551/06, § 62, 16 June 2015; and Ognevenko v. Russia, no. 44873/09, § 59, 20 November 2018).
- EGMR, 27.11.2023 - 21881/20
COMMUNAUTÉ GENEVOISE D'ACTION SYNDICALE (CGAS) v. SWITZERLAND
La Cour rappelle que la liberté syndicale est la liberté de défendre les intérêts professionnels des adhérents d'un syndicat par l'action collective de celui-ci et constitue l'un des aspects particuliers de la liberté d'association (voir Wilson, National Union of Journalists et autres c. Royaume-Uni, nos 30668/96 et 2 autres, § 42, CEDH 2002-V et Manole et « Les Cultivateurs Directs de Roumanie'c. Roumanie, no 46551/06, § 57, 16 juin 2015), c'est-à-dire l'un des différents droits énoncés à l'article 11 de la Convention.