Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68003) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.04.2006 - 18002/02
- EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 18002/02
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 48539/99
Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Umgehungsschutz; Schweigerecht; materieller / …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02
The question which must be answered is whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was obtained, were fair (see Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 42, ECHR 2002-IX). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02
While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is therefore primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 45-46, Series A no. 140 and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02
Furthermore, Article 6 § 3 (d) leaves it to the domestic courts, again as a general rule, to assess whether it is appropriate to call witnesses; it "does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf: its essential aim, as is indicated by the words "under the same conditions", is a full "equality of arms" in the matter" (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B, and Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, § 89, Series A no. 158). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 18002/02
Furthermore, Article 6 § 3 (d) leaves it to the domestic courts, again as a general rule, to assess whether it is appropriate to call witnesses; it "does not require the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused's behalf: its essential aim, as is indicated by the words "under the same conditions", is a full "equality of arms" in the matter" (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B, and Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, § 89, Series A no. 158).