Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,68935
EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,68935)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16.07.2009 - 30282/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,68935)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16. Juli 2009 - 30282/06 (https://dejure.org/2009,68935)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68935) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 29.05.2001 - 63716/00

    SAWONIUK contre le ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06
    Moreover, costs" issues are of an ancillary and largely technical nature to which the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention must apply with due flexibility, particularly in the higher courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 30, Series A no. 74, and Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716/00, ECHR 2001-VI).
  • EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

    EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06
    It is the role of the domestic courts to interpret and apply the relevant rules of procedural or substantive law (see, amongst many authorities, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34, and Fehr v. Austria, no.19247/02, § 32, 3 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

    Sutter ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06
    Moreover, costs" issues are of an ancillary and largely technical nature to which the guarantees of Article 6 of the Convention must apply with due flexibility, particularly in the higher courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 30, Series A no. 74, and Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716/00, ECHR 2001-VI).
  • EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 29373/08

    MAKRIDES v. CYPRUS

    Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in a variety of cases against Cyprus (see, for example, Christodoulou v. Cyprus, no. 30282/06, 16 July 2009; Charalambides v. Cyprus, no. 37885/04, 15 January 2009; Michael Theodossiou Ltd v. Cyprus, no. 31811/04, 15 January 2009; Mylonas v. Cyprus, no. 14790/06, 11 December 2008; Douglas v. Cyprus, no. 21929/04, 17 July 2008; Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, 6 December 2007; Odysseos v. Cyprus, no. 30503/03, 8 March 2007; Shacolas v. Cyprus, no. 47119/99, 4 May 2006).
  • EGMR, 11.03.2010 - 52814/08

    PAPAKOKKINOU v. CYPRUS (II)

    Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in a variety of cases against Cyprus (see, for example, Christodoulou v. Cyprus, no. 30282/06, 16 July 2009; Charalambides v. Cyprus, no. 37885/04, 15 January 2009; Michael Theodossiou Ltd v. Cyprus, no. 31811/04, 15 January 2009; Mylonas v. Cyprus, no. 14790/06, 11 December 2008; Douglas v. Cyprus, no. 21929/04, 17 July 2008; Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, 6 December 2007; Odysseos v. Cyprus, no. 30503/03, 8 March 2007; Shacolas v. Cyprus, no. 47119/99, 4 May 2006).
  • EGMR, 11.03.2010 - 35686/08

    PAPAKOKKINOU v. CYPRUS

    Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in a variety of cases against Cyprus (see, for example, Christodoulou v. Cyprus, no. 30282/06, 16 July 2009; Charalambides v. Cyprus, no. 37885/04, 15 January 2009; Michael Theodossiou Ltd v. Cyprus, no. 31811/04, 15 January 2009; Mylonas v. Cyprus, no. 14790/06, 11 December 2008; Douglas v. Cyprus, no. 21929/04, 17 July 2008; Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, 6 December 2007; Odysseos v. Cyprus, no. 30503/03, 8 March 2007; Shacolas v. Cyprus, no. 47119/99, 4 May 2006).
  • EGMR, 25.02.2010 - 43249/08

    CHARALAMBIDES v. CYPRUS

    Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time in a variety of cases against Cyprus (see, for example, Christodoulou v. Cyprus, no. 30282/06, 16 July 2009; Charalambides v. Cyprus, no. 37885/04, 15 January 2009; Michael Theodossiou Ltd v. Cyprus, no. 31811/04, 15 January 2009; Mylonas v. Cyprus, no. 14790/06, 11 December 2008; Douglas v. Cyprus, no. 21929/04, 17 July 2008; Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, 6 December 2007; Odysseos v. Cyprus, no. 30503/03, 8 March 2007; Shacolas v. Cyprus, no. 47119/99, 4 May 2006).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht