Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUDRIC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MUDRIC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Positive ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  Mudric gegen Moldawien

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).

  To that end States are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22 and 23, Series A no. 91; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719/97, § 118, 10 October 2002; M.C. v. Bulgaria, cited above, §§ 150 and 152, ECHR 2003-XII; Bevacqua, cited above, § 65, and Sandra Jankovic v. Croatia, no. 38478/05, § 45, 5 March 2009).

• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  The applicant submitted that the authorities "had or ought to have had knowledge" of A.M."s violence against her (see Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 30, Series A no. 247-C and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02

  STOICA v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  Consideration has been given to the opening of investigations, delays in taking statements and to the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Denis Vasilyev, cited above, § 100 with further references; and Stoica v. Romania, no. 42722/02, § 67, 4 March 2008).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  A summary of the relevant international materials concerning protection from domestic violence, including its discriminatory nature against women, has been made in the case of Opuz v. Turkey (no. 33401/02, §§ 72-86, ECHR 2009) and Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 3564/11, §§ 29-37, 28 May 2013, not yet final).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 32704/04

  DENIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 74839/10

  Furthermore, Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into the alleged ill-treatment even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII, and Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009).

• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 41237/14

  Italien muss Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt entschädigen

  (T.M. et C.M. c. République de Moldova, no 26608/11, § 62, 28 janvier 2014 ; Eremia, précité, § 98, et Mudric c. République de Moldova, no 74839/10, § 63, 16 juillet 2013).

  (see Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 3564/11, § 89, 28 May 2013), Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, § 63, 16 July 2013 and T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608/11, § 62, 7 January 2014; my emphasis)".

• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  The authorities must do whatever is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, explore all practical means of discovering the truth and deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of violence induced by, for instance, racial or religious intolerance, or violence motivated by gender-based discrimination (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII; Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, §§ 138-42; and Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, §§ 60-64, 16 July 2013).
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12

  M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA

  The authorities must do whatever is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, to explore all practical means of discovering the truth, and to deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of violence induced by, for instance, racial or religious intolerance, or violence motivated by gender-based discrimination (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII; Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others, §§ 138-42, cited above; and Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, §§ 60-64, 16 July 2013, recently reiterated in Identoba and Others, cited above, § 67).

 
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA

  The authorities must do whatever is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, explore all practical means of discovering the truth and deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of violence induced by, for instance, racial or religious intolerance, or violence motivated by gender-based discrimination (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII; Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others, cited above, §§ 139-42; and Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, §§ 60-64, 16 July 2013).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 23914/15

  GENDERDOC-M AND M.D. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  The authorities must do whatever is reasonable in the circumstances to collect and secure the evidence, explore all practical means of discovering the truth and deliver fully reasoned, impartial and objective decisions, without omitting suspicious facts that may be indicative of violence induced by, for instance, racial or religious intolerance, or violence motivated by gender-based discrimination (see Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, §§ 138-42 ; Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, §§ 60-64, 16 July 2013 ; and, under Article 2, in the context of police action, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 45422/13

  I.E. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Article 3 requires that the authorities conduct an effective official investigation into any alleged ill-treatment, even if such treatment has been inflicted by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 151, ECHR 2003-XII; Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704/04, §§ 98-99, 17 December 2009; and Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839/10, § 42, 16 July 2013).