Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 39438/13   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2015,17835
EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 39438/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,17835)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16.07.2015 - 39438/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,17835)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16. Juli 2015 - 39438/13 (https://dejure.org/2015,17835)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,17835) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NAZARENKO v. RUSSIA

    Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
    Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NAZARENKO v. RUSSIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)

  • EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 25358/12

    Leihmutterschaft darf verboten bleiben

    The right to respect for "family life" does not safeguard the mere desire to found a family; it presupposes the existence of a family (see Marckx, cited above, § 31), or at the very least the potential relationship between, for example, a child born out of wedlock and his or her natural father (see Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI), or the relationship that arises from a genuine marriage, even if family life has not yet been fully established (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no. 94), or the relationship between a father and his legitimate child even if it proves, years later, to have had no biological basis (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 58, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), or the relationship that arises from a lawful and genuine adoption (see Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 148, ECHR 2004-V (extracts)).

    Protection may also be warranted for certain family links established de facto (see for instance Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, no. 49151/07, ECHR 2009, and Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).

    The Court has thus accepted, for example, that the relationship between a man and a child, who had very close personal ties between them and who believed for many years that they were father and daughter, until it was eventually revealed that the man was not the child's biological father, amounted to family life (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 58, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).

  • EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 23280/08

    MOOG v. GERMANY

    Diese Pflichten können Maßnahmen beinhalten, die zur Sicherstellung der Achtung des Privatlebens auch im Verhältnis von einzelnen Personen untereinander ergriffen werden; dies umfasst sowohl die Schaffung eines rechtlichen Rahmens, der ein Gerichtswesen und Vollstreckungsmittel zum Schutz der Rechte des Einzelnen bietet, als auch gegebenenfalls die Umsetzung konkreter Schritte (siehe mit weiteren Nachweisen Nazarenko./. Russland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 39438/13, Rdnr. 61, ECHR 2015 (Auszüge)).
  • EGMR, 14.01.2016 - 30955/12

    MANDET c. FRANCE

    Il faut toutefois noter que, les juridictions internes ayant confié l'exercice de l'autorité parental à la première requérante, leurs décisions ne faisaient pas obstacle à ce qu'il continue à vivre au quotidien au sein de la famille constituée autour des premiers requérants, conformément à son souhait (comparer avec Nazarenko c. Russie, no 39438/13, 16 juillet 2015).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 72931/10

    V.D. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Accordingly, Article 8 of the Convention can be interpreted as imposing on member States an obligation to examine on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the child's best interests to maintain contact with a person, whether biologically related or not, who has taken care of him or her for a sufficiently long period of time (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 66, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
  • EGMR - 36335/18 (anhängig)

    FATKHUTDINOV v. RUSSIA

    For a summary of the relevant domestic law see Nazarenko v. Russia (no. 39438/13, §§ 33-40, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).

    Has the complete and automatic exclusion of the applicant from V."s life after his parental status in respect of him was terminated - in particular the denial of contact rights without giving proper consideration to V."s best interests - amounted to a failure to respect the applicant's family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, ECHR 2015 (extracts))?.

  • EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 19845/15

    GATCINAS v. LITHUANIA

    The Government referred to the Court's case-law where it held that although, as a rule, cohabitation might be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors might exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship had sufficient constancy to create de facto family ties (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple had demonstrated their commitment to each other (see Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015).
  • EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 38647/09

    ÓNODI v. HUNGARY

    The Court reiterates that the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of "family life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, § 70, 5 April 2005 and Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 60, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 62564/13

    CIAPAS v. LITHUANIA

    Although, as a rule, cohabitation may be a requirement for such a relationship, other factors may exceptionally also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto "family ties" (see Nazarenko v. Russia, no. 39438/13, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), including the length of the relationship and whether the couple have demonstrated their commitment to each other (Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 42, 8 December 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht