Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAMACHISA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SAMACHISA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38, and Habimi and Others v. Serbia, no.19072/08, § 86, 3 June 2014).
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81

  POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  A complaint is characterised by the matters alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on (see, mutatis mutandis, Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 29; Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 44; Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 167, 1 March 2001; and Eugenia Lazar v. Romania, no. 32146/05, § 60, 16 February 2010).
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 19072/08

  HABIMI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, § 38, and Habimi and Others v. Serbia, no.19072/08, § 86, 3 June 2014).

 
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 77018/01

  POLYAKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  In addition, in respect of recourse to physical force during an arrest, the Court reiterates that while Article 3 does not prohibit the use of force in order to carry out a lawful arrest, such force must not be excessive and must be necessary given the circumstances of the case (see, among others, Altay v. Turkey, no. 22279/93, § 54, 22 May 2001; Polyakov v. Russia, no. 77018/01, § 25, 29 January 2009; and Ryabtsev v. Russia, no. 13642/06, § 65, 14 November 2013).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  The Court reiterates its case-law confirming the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" in its assessment of evidence (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  The State is accordingly under an obligation to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, CEDH 1999-V, and Sarigiannis v. Italy, no. 14569/05, § 54, 5 April 2011).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29, and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, § 59, 24 July 2008).
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 13642/06

  RYABTSEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 57467/10

  In addition, in respect of recourse to physical force during an arrest, the Court reiterates that while Article 3 does not prohibit the use of force in order to carry out a lawful arrest, such force must not be excessive and must be necessary given the circumstances of the case (see, among others, Altay v. Turkey, no. 22279/93, § 54, 22 May 2001; Polyakov v. Russia, no. 77018/01, § 25, 29 January 2009; and Ryabtsev v. Russia, no. 13642/06, § 65, 14 November 2013).
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 22279/93

  ALTAY c. TURQUIE

• EGMR, 16.04.2019 - 48474/14

  LINGURAR v. ROMANIA

  The Court refers to the general principles set out in its case-law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment and the requirement of an effective investigation into such allegations, as enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Boaca and Others v. Romania, no. 40355/11, §§ 66-67, 74-75 and 81-84, 12 January 2016; and Samachisa v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 59-64, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 70040/13

  VASILE VICTOR STANCIU v. ROMANIA

  The relevant principles concerning the State's obligations under Article 3 of the Convention in instances of police violence, including when it is alleged that the force used by the police during an arrest was excessive, are set out in Bouyid v. Belgium ([GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and §§ 114-123, ECHR 2015; see also Samachisa v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 60-64, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 40374/11

  BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  The Court refers to the general principles set out in its case-law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment and the requirement of an effective investigation into such allegations as enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-123, ECHR 2015; Boaca, cited above, §§ 66-67, 74-75 and 81-84; and Samachisa v. Romania, no. 57467/10, §§ 59-64, 16 July 2015).