Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08, 35949/11, 58282/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,20091) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. ...
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (12) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00
DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
61164/00 and 18589/02, 4 February 2003, and ?˜ehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004).61164/00 and 18589/02, ECHR 2003-II).
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 66274/09
LIGUE DES MUSULMANS DE SUISSE ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
They were directly affected by the authorities" refusals to register them (compare and contrast Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 48, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and La Ligue des Musulmans de Suisse and Others v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 66274/09, 28 June 2011). - EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 40825/98
RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
For example, a religious association could exercise on behalf of its adherents the rights guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 (see Cha"are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, §§ 72 and 87, ECHR 2000-VII; see also Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, § 88, 31 July 2008).
- EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01
KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
Thus, the status afforded to unregistered public associations significantly restricts the right to freedom of association of the founders and members of such an association (compare Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2009; Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia, no. 47191/06, § 38, 2 October 2014; and Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others, cited above, §§ 102 and 103, all concerning refusals to register religious organisations). - EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 47191/06
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF ST PETERSBURG AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
Thus, the status afforded to unregistered public associations significantly restricts the right to freedom of association of the founders and members of such an association (compare Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, §§ 85-86, ECHR 2009; Church of Scientology of St Petersburg and Others v. Russia, no. 47191/06, § 38, 2 October 2014; and Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others, cited above, §§ 102 and 103, all concerning refusals to register religious organisations). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 27417/95
CHA'ARE SHALOM VE TSEDEK v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
For example, a religious association could exercise on behalf of its adherents the rights guaranteed by Article 9 of the Convention, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 (see Cha"are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, §§ 72 and 87, ECHR 2000-VII; see also Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825/98, § 88, 31 July 2008). - EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 22412/08
EMARS v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
The use of offensive language is a ground for rejecting the application in "certain exceptional cases" (see Emars v. Latvia, no. 22412/08, § 46, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 42168/06
DMITRIYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
The Court reiterates that the concepts of "national security" and "public safety" must be applied with restraint and interpreted restrictively (see Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, § 54, ECHR 2007-V, and Dmitriyevskiy v. Russia, no. 42168/06, § 86, 3 October 2017). - EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
ISLAM-ITTIHAD ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
41340/98 and 3 others, §§ 49-50, ECHR 2003-II; Republican Party of Russia v. Russia, no. 12976/07, §§ 91 and 100, 1 April 2011; Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Romania [GC], no. 2330/09, §§ 81 and 149, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Association of Victims of Romanian Judges and Others v. Romania, no. 47732/06, §§ 11 and 20, 14 January 2014; and Islam-Ittihad Association and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 5548/05, §§ 31 and 41, 13 November 2014). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08
In order to comply with the rule, applicants should normally use remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.01.2011 - 38110/08
SAKELLAROPOULOS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 23.01.2023 - 61435/19
Verstoß gegen Meinungsfreiheit: Geschichten über gleichgeschlechtliche …
12200/08 and 2 others, §§ 180-81, 16 July 2019; and Berkman v. Russia, no. 46712/15, §§ 55-57, 1 December 2020). - EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 58817/15
D.B. ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Voir aussi Zhdanov et autres c. Russie, n° 12200/08, 16 juillet 2019, où la Cour a jugé que les autorités russes avaient violé les droits des requérants au titre des articles 11 et 14 combinés avec l'article 11 de la Convention ; et Alekseyev et autres c. Russie, nos 14988/09 et 50 autres, 27 novembre 2018. - EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 40119/21
M.L. v. POLAND
The Court's assessment 120. The Court reiterates that the concept of "abuse" within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention must be understood in its ordinary sense according to general legal theory - namely, the harmful exercise of a right for purposes other than those for which it is designed (see Zhdanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, § 79, 16 July 2019).
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 41994/21
Zambrano ./. Frankreich - Beschwerde gegen Corona-Gesundheitspass in Frankreich …
Sur ce dernier point, la Cour a précisé que le « comportement abusif'du requérant qu'elle exige doit non seulement être manifestement contraire à la vocation du droit de recours, mais aussi entraver le bon fonctionnement de la Cour ou le bon déroulement de la procédure devant elle (Miroļubovs et autres, précité, § 65, et Zhdanov et autres c. Russie, nos 12200/08, 35949/11 et 58282/12, § 81, 16 juillet 2019). - EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 13918/06
SAVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
The Court's assessment 57. Decisions by the authorities to refuse to register, or to dissolve a group have been found to affect directly both the group itself and also its presidents, founders or individual members (see Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 101, 10 June 2010, with further references; see also Islam-Ittihad Association and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 5548/05, § 58, 13 November 2014, and Zhdanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, § 116, 16 July 2019). - EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 61534/11
ANALISI CLINICHE BIOS DI G. PASSARELLI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.11.2023 - 37316/16
ECOLOGICAL AND HUMANITARIAN ASSOCIATION ZELENYY SVIT v. UKRAINE
The Court, in the light of the applicable general principles as set out in, for example, Zhdanov and Others v. Russia (nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, §§ 79-81, 16 July 2019), does not discern in the applicant's actions any elements of the possible "harmful exercise of a right for purposes other than those for which it is designed" impeding the proper functioning of the Court or the proper conduct of the proceedings before it. - EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 31163/13
VLAHOV v. CROATIA
In so doing, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in the Convention and, moreover, that they based their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see, for instance, Zhdanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, § 141, 16 July 2019, with further references). - EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 29319/13
ZHOKH v. UKRAINE
The Court, in the light of the applicable general principles as set out in, for example, Zhdanov and Others v. Russia (nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, §§ 79-81, 16 July 2019), does not discern in the applicant's actions any evidence of the possible "harmful exercise of a right for purposes other than those for which it is designed" impeding the proper functioning of the Court or the proper conduct of the proceedings before it. - EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 65906/13
AVRAMCHUK v. UKRAINE
The Court, in the light of the applicable general principles as set out in, for example, Zhdanov and Others v. Russia (nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, §§ 79-81, 16 July 2019), does not discern in the applicant's actions any elements of possible "harmful exercise of a right for purposes other than those for which it is designed" and which impedes the proper functioning of the Court or the proper conduct of the proceedings before it. - EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 18036/13
EASTERN UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INITIATIVES v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 2446/15
ALEKSEYEVY c. RUSSIE