Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 1431/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,64549) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STOJANOVSKI v. \
Art. 5, Art. 6 MRK
Partly admissible partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 1431/03
- EGMR, 22.10.2009 - 1431/03
- EGMR, 10.05.2017 - 1431/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 1431/03
However, once this burden of proof has been satisfied it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact exhausted or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 68). - EGMR, 22.12.2004 - 68864/01
MERGER AND CROS v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 1431/03
Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see, mutatis mutandis, Merger and Cros v. France (dec.), no. 68864/01, 11 March 2004; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, ECHR 1996-VI, §§ 51-52; and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, ECHR 1996-IV, §§ 65-67).