Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,54817) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35765/97
A.D.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Moreover, the fact that the behaviour in question is prohibited by the criminal law is not sufficient in itself to bring it outside the scope of "private life" (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; Norris v. Ireland, judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142; A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98
P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Since there are occasions when people knowingly or intentionally involve themselves in activities which are or may be recorded or reported in a public manner, a person's reasonable expectations as to privacy may be a significant, though not necessarily conclusive, factor (P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Moreover, the Contracting States enjoy a margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment (Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 88, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
The Court notes that parties did not dispute that the proceedings before the ET, EAT and Court of Appeal were for the determination of civil rights and the Court agrees that Article 6 § 1 applies (Vilho Eskilinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007). - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Nor was the fact that Roissy was a commercial enterprise sufficient to bring his activities outside the scope of Article 8, since that provision protected the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings, including entering into relationships of a professional or business nature (Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
The Court recalls that Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 33). - EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83
NORRIS c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Moreover, the fact that the behaviour in question is prohibited by the criminal law is not sufficient in itself to bring it outside the scope of "private life" (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; Norris v. Ireland, judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142; A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IX). - EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76
DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05
Moreover, the fact that the behaviour in question is prohibited by the criminal law is not sufficient in itself to bring it outside the scope of "private life" (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; Norris v. Ireland, judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142; A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IX).
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 61496/08
Firma durfte Mitarbeiter wegen privater Nachrichten kündigen
59. While it is true that it had not been claimed that the applicant had caused actual damage to his employer (compare and contrast Pay v. United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 32792/05, 16 September 2008 where the applicant was involved outside work in activities that were not compatible with his professional duties, and Köpke (cited above), where the applicant had caused material losses to her employer), the Court finds that it is not unreasonable for an employer to want to verify that the employees are completing their professional tasks during working hours.The Court has already stated that privacy rights may not be asserted in the context of conduct away from the workplace, relied upon by an employer as grounds for dismissal (Pay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32792/05, 16 September 2008).
- EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 49327/11
Ohne Kleidung durch England: Nackt-Wanderer verliert
no. 32792/05, 16 September 2003).