Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDI AHMED AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 17, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 4 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ABDI AHMED AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 17550/90

  VIJAYANATHAN AND PUSPARAJAH v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 43985/13

  Therefore, also for that reason, the applicants in that position cannot at this stage claim to be victims within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, 27 August 1992, § 46, Series A no. 241-B, and Dubrov, (dec.), cited above).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 43985/13

  In view of the importance which the Court attaches to Article 3 of the Convention and the irreversible nature of the damage which may result if the risk of torture or ill-treatment materialises, the effectiveness of a remedy within the meaning of Article 13 imperatively requires close scrutiny by a national authority (see Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 448, ECHR 2005-III), independent and rigorous scrutiny of any claim that there exist substantial grounds for fearing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Jabari v. Turkey, no. 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII), as well as a particularly prompt response (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)); it also requires that the person concerned should have access to a remedy with automatic suspensive effect (see Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, §§ 81-83, ECHR 2002-I, and Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no. 25389/05, § 66, ECHR 2007-II).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 43985/13

  In this context, the lack of free legal aid may raise an issue as to the accessibility of a remedy (see, in respect of remedies for the purpose of Article 5 § 4, Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no. 30471/08, § 141, 22 September 2009, and Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 53 in fine, Reports 1996-III; and in the context of Article 6 § 1 for the purposes of civil litigation, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 26, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 07.03.2000 - 43844/98

  Dubliner Übereinkommen, Dublinverfahren, Großbritannien, Sri Lanka, sichere …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 43985/13

  That matter would in fact concern the merits of the applicants" complaint under Article 13, where in the context of the expulsion of asylum seekers, the Court would have to assess whether effective guarantees existed that protected the applicant against arbitrary refoulement, be it direct or indirect, to the country from which he or she has fled (see, among other authorities, T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 43844/98, ECHR 2000-III, and M.S.S., cited above, § 286).

• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 56796/13

  ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA

  The Government further relied on the Court's general principles cited in Abdi Ahmed and Others v. Malta ((dec.), no. 43985/13, 16 September 2014) and to its findings in that case, where the Court had established that the situation having ended, the duration of proceedings no longer rendered the remedy ineffective.

  Further, the Court notes firstly that the circumstances of the present case are different to those in the case of Abdi Ahmed and Others v. Malta ((dec.), no. 43985/13, 16 September 2014), relied on by the Government.

• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 8143/18

  M.C. AND F.S.B. v. AZERBAIJAN

  As regards the complaint under Article 3, the Court reiterates that in cases where applicants have faced expulsion or extradition, they could not claim to be the "victim" of a measure which was not enforceable (see Etanji v. France (dec.), no. 60411/00, 1 March 2005, Abdi Ahmed and Others v. Malta (dec.), no. 43985/13, §§ 80 and 81, 16 September 2014).