Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14, 23274/14, 74276/14, 78541/14, 4989/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16.09.2021 - 1781/14, 23274/14, 74276/14, 78541/14, 4989/15 (https://dejure.org/2021,37339)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 16. September 2021 - 1781/14, 23274/14, 74276/14, 78541/14, 4989/15 (https://dejure.org/2021,37339)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,37339) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LUTAYENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
LUTAYENKO v. UKRAINE and 1 other application
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
(b) a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the applicant's complaint concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him, in the light of the Court's findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, judgment of 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
(b) a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the applicant's complaint concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him, in the light of the Court's findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, judgment of 30 March 2004). - EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 40378/06
Y.Y. v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
In the light of its findings in a number of other cases (see, in particular, mutatis mutandis, Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, §§ 33-36 and 41-44, ECHR 2003-IX; Fyodorov and Fyodorova v. Ukraine, no. 39229/03, §§ 82-86, 7 July 2011; Konovalova v. Russia, no. 37873/04, §§ 48-50, 9 October 2014; and Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, §§ 55-60, 23 February 2016) the Court concludes that the present complaint is admissible and that it discloses a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.
- EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 5353/14
BORZYKH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
The Court considers that it has already addressed the main legal questions raised in the present applications, and that there is no need to make a separate assessment of the admissibility and merits of the complaints mentioned in paragraph 19 above (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Borzykh and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 5353/14 and others, §§ 48-49, 25 June 2020). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
The Court considers that it has already addressed the main legal questions raised in the present applications, and that there is no need to make a separate assessment of the admissibility and merits of the complaints mentioned in paragraph 19 above (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Borzykh and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 5353/14 and others, §§ 48-49, 25 June 2020). - EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 39229/03
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
In the light of its findings in a number of other cases (see, in particular, mutatis mutandis, Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, §§ 33-36 and 41-44, ECHR 2003-IX; Fyodorov and Fyodorova v. Ukraine, no. 39229/03, §§ 82-86, 7 July 2011; Konovalova v. Russia, no. 37873/04, §§ 48-50, 9 October 2014; and Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, §§ 55-60, 23 February 2016) the Court concludes that the present complaint is admissible and that it discloses a violation of Article 8 of the Convention. - EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 66561/01
MERIT v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.09.2021 - 1781/14
(b) a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the applicant's complaint concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him, in the light of the Court's findings in Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; and Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, judgment of 30 March 2004).
- VG Schwerin, 20.01.2017 - 15 A 3003/16
Asylrecht: Flüchtlingseigenschaft wegen Entziehung vom Nationaldienst durch …
- Vgl. nur VG Schwerin, Urteil vom 15. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1781/14 -, Umdruck, S. 5 ff.; Urteil vom 29. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1264/14 As - Umdruck, S. 4 ff.; Urteil vom 28. September 2015 - 3 A 291/15 -, Umdruck, S. 3 ff.; vgl. auch VG Schwerin, Urteil vom 29. Februar 2016 - 15 A 3628/15 As SN -, juris Rn. 22 ff., 55 ff. sowie VG Schwerin, Urteil vom 08. Juli 2016 - 15 A 190/15 As -, juris Rn. 32 ff. -. - VG Schwerin, 29.02.2016 - 15 A 3628/15
Eritrea: Zuerkennung der Flüchtlingseigenschaft bei eritreischen …
- Vgl. nur VG C-Stadt, Urteil vom 15. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1781/14 -, Umdruck, S. 5 ff.; Urteil vom 29. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1264/14 As - Umdruck, S. 4 ff.; Urteil vom 28. September 2015 -, - 3 A 291/15 -, Umdruck, S. 3 ff, -. - VG Schwerin, 22.03.2019 - 15 A 4466/17
Asylverfahren Eritrea; Entziehung vom Nationaldienst
- Vgl. nur VG Schwerin, Urteil vom 15. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1781/14 -, Umdruck, S. 5 ff.; Urteil vom 29. Juni 2015 - 3 A 1264/14 As - Umdruck, S. 4 ff.; Urteil vom 28. September 2015 -, - 3 A 291/15 -, Umdruck, S. 3 ff. -.