Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SKAWINSKA v. POLAND

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98
• EGMR, 04.03.2003 - 42096/98
• EGMR, 16.09.2003 - 42096/98

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 34720/97

  HEANEY ET McGUINNESS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  The Court recalls that an accused's acquittal, in general, excludes that person from claiming to be a victim of a violation of the procedural guarantees of Article 6 (see Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, ECHR 2000-XII, § 43).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings is to be determined in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, in particular the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, inter alia, Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 19, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 45995/99

  RUTKOWSKI contre la POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  The Court sees no indication of negligence on the part of the lawyer (cf. Rutkowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  Treatment has been held by the Court to be "degrading" because it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating or debasing them (see, inter alia, the Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 65, § 100).
• EGMR, 23.03.1994 - 14220/88

  RAVNSBORG v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  (a) The Court does not find it necessary to examine whether Article 6 of the Convention applies to proceedings concerning the imposition of fines for contempt of court under Polish law (cf. the Ravnsborg v. Sweden judgment of 23 March 1994, Series A no. 283-B, p. 29, §§ 30-36), since in any event the Convention itself does not guarantee the right to appeal or to a second level of jurisdiction.
• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  Further, the Court reiterates that Article 14 safeguards from discrimination individuals placed in analogous situations (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 15, § 32).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95

  ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 42096/98

  (b) As regards the complaint under Article 13, the Court reiterates that this provision requires a remedy only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, inter alia, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 59, ECHR 2000-IV).