Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TARA AND POIATA v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 10 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  In such circumstances, the information could have reasonably appeared to the author of the articles to be reliable (see, mutatis mutandis, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 68, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95

  JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  The requirement to prove the truth of a value judgment is impossible to fulfil and infringes freedom of opinion itself, which is a fundamental part of the right secured by Article 10 (see Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 42, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 35071/97

  GUNDUZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (for the recapitulation of the relevant principles in more detail, see Giniewski v. France, no. 64016/00, §§ 43-54, ECHR 2006-...; Aydın Tatlav v. Turkey, no. 50692/99, §§ 22-27, 2 May 2006; Gündüz v. Turkey, no. 35071/97, § 38, ECHR 2003-XI; and Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, §§ 65-69, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), with further references).

 
• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00

  Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  In any event, the Court has always awarded costs and expenses in situations where the fees were not paid by the applicants to their lawyers before the Court's judgment (see, among other authorities, Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 493, ECHR 2004-VII, and Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02

  CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  In any event, the Court has always awarded costs and expenses in situations where the fees were not paid by the applicants to their lawyers before the Court's judgment (see, among other authorities, Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 493, ECHR 2004-VII, and Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 50692/99

  AYDIN TATLAV c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (for the recapitulation of the relevant principles in more detail, see Giniewski v. France, no. 64016/00, §§ 43-54, ECHR 2006-...; Aydın Tatlav v. Turkey, no. 50692/99, §§ 22-27, 2 May 2006; Gündüz v. Turkey, no. 35071/97, § 38, ECHR 2003-XI; and Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, §§ 65-69, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  The Court reiterates that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, § 35).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 36305/03

  The Court notes that the articles were written by a journalist and reiterates the pre-eminent role of the press in a democratic society to impart ideas and opinions on political matters and on other matters of public interest (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, § 65).