Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 8 EMRK; Art. 13 GG; Art. 12 GG; Art. 20 Abs. 3 GG; § 102 StPO; § 103 StPO; § 105 StPO; § 110 StPO; § 106 StPO
  Rechtswidrige Durchsuchung einer Anwaltskanzlei zur Erlangung elektronisch gespeicherter Daten und tatsächliche Wahrnehmbarkeit von Schutzrechten zugunsten der anwaltlichen Verschwiegenheit (Eingriff in das Privatleben, die Korrespondenz und die Wohnung bei Anwälten und ...

• IWW
• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WIESER ET BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH c. AUTRICHE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 8 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire (premier requérant) Remboursement partiel frais et dépens (premier requérant) (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WIESER AND BICOS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (first applicant) Costs and expenses - partial award (first applicant) (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.05.2006 - 74336/01
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01
• EGMR, 06.06.2012 - 74336/01

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2008, 3409

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01

  The Court reiterates that the search of a lawyer's office has been regarded as interfering with "private life" and "correspondence" and, potentially, home, in the wider sense implied by the French text which uses the term "domicile" (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 33-35, §§ 29-33, and Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finnland, no. 50882/99, § 71, 27 September 2005, which confirms that the search of a lawyer's business premises also interfered with his right to respect for his "home").
• EGMR, 19.09.2002 - 62002/00

  TAMOSIUS contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01

  The Court reiterates that the search of a lawyer's office has been regarded as interfering with "private life" and "correspondence" and, potentially, home, in the wider sense implied by the French text which uses the term "domicile" (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 33-35, §§ 29-33, and Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finnland, no. 50882/99, § 71, 27 September 2005, which confirms that the search of a lawyer's business premises also interfered with his right to respect for his "home").
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01

  The search of a company's business premises was also found to interfere with its right to respect for its "home" (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, ECHR 2002-III, §§ 40-42).
• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 50882/99

  PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 74336/01

  The Court reiterates that the search of a lawyer's office has been regarded as interfering with "private life" and "correspondence" and, potentially, home, in the wider sense implied by the French text which uses the term "domicile" (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 33-35, §§ 29-33, and Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; see also Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finnland, no. 50882/99, § 71, 27 September 2005, which confirms that the search of a lawyer's business premises also interfered with his right to respect for his "home").

• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  Most significantly, the search in Mr Drel's office was not accompanied by appropriate procedural safeguards, for example a court warrant, as required by the Advocacy Act and confirmed by the Constitutional Court (see paragraphs 398 and 399 above; see also, mutatis mutandis, Aleksanyan, cited above, § 214; Golovan v. Ukraine, no. 41716/06, § 64, 5 July 2012; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, ECHR 2007-IV).
• OLG Stuttgart, 29.02.2012 - 20 W 5/11

  Auskunftsrecht des Aktionärs einer börsennotierten Gesellschaft: Erforderlichkeit …

  Dieser Begriff wird in der EMRK dahin verstanden, dass er auch die beruflichen Tätigkeiten natürlicher Personen und geschäftliche Tätigkeiten juristischer Personen umfasst (EGMR, NJW 2008, 3409, 3410 zu Artikel 8 EMRK); demnach können sich auch juristische Personen auf den Schutz ihres "Privatlebens" berufen.
• EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 24117/08

  BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  The applicant companies relied on Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria (no. 74336/01, § 45, ECHR 2007-IV), where the search and seizure of electronic data in relation to a legal person had been found to constitute an interference with the applicant's right to respect for correspondence.

  In the criminal field, however, the Court's case-law surrounds such measures with a number of important safeguards against abuse and arbitrariness, and particularly "whether the search was based on a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion [and] whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 37, and Wiser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, 16 October 2007, § 56).

 
• EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 97/11

  DELTA PEKÁRNY A.S. c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE

  Se référant aux arrêts Société Colas Est et autres c. France (no 37971/97, § 41, CEDH 2002-III) et Wieser et Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH c. Autriche (no 74336/01, § 57, 16 octobre 2007), la société requérante soutient que l'inspection effectuée par l'Autorité de la concurrence dans ses locaux commerciaux n'a pas satisfait aux exigences de l'article 8 § 2 de la Convention, en ce qu'elle n'était pas soumise à une autorisation préalable d'un tribunal ou d'un autre organe indépendant ni n'était entourée d'autres garanties contre l'arbitraire.

  Dans des affaires comparables, elle a ainsi recherché en particulier si la perquisition a été opérée en vertu d'un mandat décerné par un juge et reposant sur des motifs plausibles de soupçonner l'intéressé et si le mandat était d'une portée raisonnable (Wieser et Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH c. Autriche, no 74336/01, § 57, CEDH 2007-IV).

• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 38224/03

  Sanoma Uitgevers BV ./. Niederlande

  In situations of urgency, a procedure should exist to identify and isolate, prior to the exploitation of the material by the authorities, information that could lead to the identification of sources from information that carries no such risk (see, mutatis mutandis, Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 62-66, ECHR 2007-XI).
• EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 63629/10

  VINCI CONSTRUCTION ET GTM GÉNIE CIVIL ET SERVICES c. FRANCE

  Plus précisément, la fouille et la saisie de données électroniques s'analysent en une ingérence dans le droit au respect de la « vie privée'et de la « correspondance'au sens de ces dispositions (voir, entre autres, Sallinen et autres c. Finlande, no 50882/99, § 71, 27 septembre 2005, Weber et Saravia c. Allemagne (déc.), no 54934/00, § 77, 29 juin 2006, Wieser et Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH c. Autriche, no 74336/01, § 43, CEDH 2007-IV, et Robathin c. Autriche, no 30457/06, § 39, 3 juillet 2012).
• EGMR, 22.12.2008 - 46468/06

  ALEKSANYAN v. RUSSIA

  According to the Court's case-law, the search of a lawyer's office, including documents and electronic data, amounts to an interference with his "private life", "home" and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-33, Series A no. 251-B; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 5201/11

  SHER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Elements taken into consideration are, in particular, whether the search was undertaken pursuant to a warrant issued by a judge and based on reasonable suspicion; whether the scope of the warrant was reasonably limited; and - where the search of a lawyer's office was concerned - whether the search was carried out in the presence of an independent observer in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see Robathin, cited above, § 44; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 57, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  According to the Court's case-law, the search of a lawyer's office, including, as in the present case, electronic data, amounts to an interference with his "private life", "home" and "correspondence" (see Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 33-35, §§ 29-33; Tamosius v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62002/00, ECHR 2002-VIII; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, §§ 70-72, 27 September 2005; and Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 459/18

  SABER v. NORWAY

  [11] Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, ECHR 2007-IV, § 65.
• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 26419/10

  SAINT-PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. c. LUXEMBOURG
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 20.04.2023 - C-548/21

  Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck (Tentative d'accès aux données personnelles …
• EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 33066/04

  MANCEVSCHI v. MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 12.02.2015 - 5678/06

  YUDITSKAYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA