Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KEDZIOR v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Stanislaw Kedzior v. Poland

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 45026/07

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 secures to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his or her civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  This "right to court", of which the right of access is an aspect, may be relied on by anyone who considers on arguable grounds that an interference with the exercise of his or her civil rights is unlawful and complains that no possibility has been afforded to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 117, ECHR 2005-X, and Salontaji--Drobnjak v. Serbia, no. 36500/05, § 132, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 24.05.2006 - 20627/04

  LIAKOPOULOU c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  A limitation will violate the Convention if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 52-57, ECHR 2001-VI, and Liakopoulou v. Greece, no. 20627/04, §§ 19-25, 24 May 2006).

 
• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

  KREUZ c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  A limitation will violate the Convention if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 52-57, ECHR 2001-VI, and Liakopoulou v. Greece, no. 20627/04, §§ 19-25, 24 May 2006).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  The relevant international instruments and conclusions on the comparative law are set out in the judgment of Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 72, 73 and 88-95, ECHR 2012.
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  Account must be taken of a whole range of factors arising in a particular case, such as the type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 92, Series A no. 39, and Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 41, Series A no. 93).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  In any event, the applicant's representative considered that his detention had also been illegal in the light of the Winterwerp criteria (see Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33).
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  Nonetheless, it is essential that the person concerned should have access to a court and the opportunity to be heard either in person or, where necessary, through some form of representation (see Megyeri v. Germany, 12 May 1992, § 22, Series A no. 237-A; see also Stanev, cited above, § 171).
• EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 45508/99

  H.L. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  The Court notes its case-law to the effect that a person could be considered to have been "detained" for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 even during a period when he or she was in an open ward with regular unescorted access to unsecured hospital grounds and the possibility of unescorted leave outside the hospital (see H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 92, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 61603/00

  Konventionskonforme Auslegung des deutschen (Zivil-)Rechts …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  A person can only be considered to have been deprived of his liberty if, as an additional subjective element, he has not validly consented to the confinement in question (see Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 74, ECHR 2005-V).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 44009/05

  SHTUKATUROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75

  X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 39187/98

  H.M. v. SWITZERLAND

• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 41244/14

  WIELOGÓRSKI v. POLAND

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the placement of persons in a social care home are set out in the Court's judgment in the case of Kedzior v. Poland (no. 45026/07, §§ 38-45, 16 October 2012).