Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TAKTAKISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 1 MRK
  Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 72040/01

  MARTYNA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 46055/06

  The Court reiterates that it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Martyna v. Poland (dec.), no. 72040/01, 15 January 2008).
• EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 18757/06

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (Abgrenzung der unzulässigen Tatprovokation von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 46055/06

  In this regard, the Court first of all notes that there already exists well-established case-law on the limits of the use of investigation methods like the one complained of (see, for instance, Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, 9 June 1998, §§ 35-36 and 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV; Miliniene v. Lithuania, no. 74355/01, §§ 32-41, 24 June 2008; Ramanauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 74420/01, § 54, ECHR 2008; Gorgievski v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 18002/02, §§ 52 and 53, 16 July 2009; and Bannikova v. Russia, no. 18757/06, §§ 33-65, 4 November 2010).

• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 504/08

  CASTELLINO c. BELGIQUE

  Elle n'exclut en particulier pas que le requérant ait besoin, afin de pouvoir demander, le cas échéant, la révision de l'arrêt litigieux de la Cour de cassation, d'un arrêt de la Cour constatant explicitement une violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention et rappelle avoir décidé dans le même sens dans l'affaire Hakimi (Hakimi c. Belgique, no 665/08, §§ 26-30, 29 juin 2010 ; voir en outre Kessler c. Suisse, no 10577/04, § 24, 26 juillet 2007 ; Rozhin c. Russie, no 50098/07, 6 mars 2012 ; Vojtechova c. Slovaquie, no 59102/08, 25 septembre 2012 ; Taktashvili c. Georgie (déc.), no 46055/06, 16 octobre 2012).
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70820/10

  TABAGARI v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part of an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013).
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 5609/08

  BULIA AND KVINIKADZE v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012).

 
• EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 31197/06

  OBOLADZE AND LOBZHANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part of an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013).
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 31420/10

  KAVTELADZE v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 10300/07

  MIMINOSHVILI v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicants wish the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013).
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 35199/10

  JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 19882/07

  MAZANASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  The Court also reiterates that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part of an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government, even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012, and Beridze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 16206/06, 30 April 2013).
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 51603/09

  BASILASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 16206/06

  BERIDZE v. GEORGIA

  It also recalls that, in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes the examination of the case to be continued (see Taktakishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 46055/06, 16 October 2012).
• EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 39726/04

  MOLASHVILI v. GEORGIA