Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GORDIYENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Gordiyenko v. Ukraine

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GORDIYENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 34331/03

  SPINOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27620/09

  However, such force may be used only if indispensable and must not be excessive (see, among others, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII; Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007; and Spinov v. Ukraine, no. 34331/03, § 51, 27 November 2008).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27620/09

  However, the ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 119-20, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27620/09

  However, such force may be used only if indispensable and must not be excessive (see, among others, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII; Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007; and Spinov v. Ukraine, no. 34331/03, § 51, 27 November 2008).
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 48130/99

  IVAN VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27620/09

  However, such force may be used only if indispensable and must not be excessive (see, among others, Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 68-78, ECHR 2000-XII; Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007; and Spinov v. Ukraine, no. 34331/03, § 51, 27 November 2008).

• EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 26815/16

  PETRAKOVSKYY AND LEONTYEV v. Ukraine v. UKRAINE

  (iv) Hasty conclusion that the injuries could have been sustained during a sparring match, relying essentially on officers' statements denying ill-treatment and on the delayed questioning of a martial arts coach, who could not recall the February 2011 training schedule (for relevant examples, see Gordiyenko v. Ukraine, no. 27620/09, §§ 95-96, 16 October 2014, and Kleutin v. Ukraine, no. 5911/05, § 68, 23 June 2016).
• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 13577/16

  STOROZHUK AND KONONOV v. UKRAINE

  (iv) Hasty conclusion that the documented injuries could have been sustained by falling on the stairs, without establishing the relevant timing and circumstances and omission to address the applicant's allegations of threats and the abuse of a gas mask and the undocumented injuries allegedly visible on the video-recording (for relevant examples, see Gordiyenko v. Ukraine, no. 27620/09, §§ 95-96, 16 October 2014; and Kleutin v. Ukraine, no. 5911/05, § 68, 23 June 2016).