Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27623/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,29865) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BELOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Belov v. Russia
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 63831/00
CHALKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27623/06
Thus, the applicant was afforded a flexible time-limit to complete an application form provided he did it "with reasonable expedition", which, in certain circumstances, could last for years (compare with Chalkley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63831/00, 26 September 2002, where two and a half years had passed between the dates of submission of the first letter and of the despatch of the completed application form, and still the former was considered to be the date of introduction). - EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 20111/03
MAGOMEDOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27623/06
Even though he had not raised the issue of the conditions of his detention therein, he did so in the subsequent letter of 3 April 2007, which the Court considers an integral part of that application (see Magomedov v. Russia, no. 20111/03, § 17, 4 December 2008).