Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DUMPE v. LATVIA

  Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DUMPE v. LATVIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 61243/08

  ELBERTE v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  The relevant provisions pertaining to the rights of civil parties in criminal proceedings under the Criminal Procedure Law (Kriminalprocesa likums) have been quoted in Elberte v. Latvia (no. 61243/08, § 55, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 16825/02

  PLOTINA v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Indeed, the Court's case-law suggests that adjudication of civil matters without a final judgment in criminal proceedings relating to those civil matters is, in principle, possible in Latvia (see Y v. Latvia, cited above, § 71; Blumberga, cited above, § 68; and Plotina v. Latvia (dec.), no. 16825/02, §§ 62-63, 3 June 2008).

 
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 48609/06

  NENCHEVA ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Furthermore, this case should be distinguished from cases where the domestic authorities had been aware of the appalling conditions that later led to the deaths of young people placed in social care homes or hospitals and had nonetheless unreasonably put the lives of those people in danger (see Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, §§ 113, 121-24, 18 June 2013, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 141-44, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 19.07.2018 - 58240/08

  SARISHVILI-BOLKVADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  There are different avenues for ensuring Convention rights, and even if the State has failed to apply one particular measure provided by domestic law, it may still fulfil its positive duty by other means (see Sarishvili-Bolkvadze v. Georgia, no. 58240/08, § 90, 19 July 2018).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Furthermore, this case should be distinguished from cases where the domestic authorities had been aware of the appalling conditions that later led to the deaths of young people placed in social care homes or hospitals and had nonetheless unreasonably put the lives of those people in danger (see Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, §§ 113, 121-24, 18 June 2013, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 141-44, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Disciplinary measures may also be envisaged (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 71506/13

  Rather, the Court's task, having regard to the proceedings as a whole, is to review whether and to what extent the domestic authorities submitted the case to the careful scrutiny required by Article 2 of the Convention (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 257, ECHR 2016).

• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21

  ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA

  To comply with the exhaustion rule in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, applicants who have at their disposal a domestic remedy plainly more suited to their situation must attempt it, even if they have already resorted to a less effective one (see Dumpe v. Latvia, no. 71506/13, §§ 61 and 70-76, 16 October 2018; Mirenic-Huzjak and Jerkovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 72996/16, §§ 54-56, 24 September 2019; and Köhler v. Germany (dec.), no. 3443/18, §§ 67-74, 7 September 2021).
• EGMR, 29.06.2021 - 26691/18

  BRODA ET BOJARA c. POLOGNE

  La Cour a explicitement considéré que les actions civiles en dommages et intérêts constituaient une voie de recours à épuiser pour maints types de violations des droits de l'homme, et notamment pour les violations de l'article 2 résultant d'une erreur médicale (V.P. c. Estonie (déc.), no 14185/14, §§ 52-61, 10 octobre 2017, Lopes de Sousa Fernandes c. Portugal [GC], no 56080/13, §§ 137-138, 19 décembre 2017, et Dumpe c. Lettonie (déc.), no 71506/13, §§ 55-76, 16 octobre 2018) ou d'un accident (Nicolae Virgiliu Taanase c. Roumanie ([GC], no 41720/13, 25 juin 2019).
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5766/17

  BOTOYAN v. ARMENIA

  This requires establishing, firstly, whether the civil-law remedy was effective in theory and in practice at the relevant time; that is to say that the remedy was accessible, capable of providing redress in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success and, secondly, whether it would pursue essentially the same objective as the criminal-law remedy, that is to say, whether the civil-law remedy would add any essential elements that were unavailable through the use of the criminal-law remedy (see Dumpe v. Latvia (dec.), no. 71506/13, § 61, 16 October 2018).

 
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 21648/11

  TRASKUNOVA v. RUSSIA

  It is furthermore unclear, in the absence of any submissions on this point from the Government, whether a civil-law remedy would have pursued the same objective as the criminal-law remedy, or, in other words, whether it would have added any essential elements that were unavailable through the use of the criminal-law remedy (compare and contrast Dumpe v. Latvia (dec.), no. 71506/13, §§ 61 and 70-77, 16 October 2018, and Milic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 62876/15, §§ 59-60, 21 May 2019).
• EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 41603/13

  FABRIS ET PARZIALE c. ITALIE

  Il s'ensuit que, lors de la clôture de la procédure pénale en décembre 2012, 1e délai pour l'introduction d'une action en dommage-intérêts était expiré depuis plusieurs mois, si bien qu'une telle voie de recours ne s'offrait plus au requérant une fois écartée l'existence d'infractions pénales (voir, a contrario, Benmouna et autres c. France (déc.), no 51097/13, §§ 48 et 52, et, mutatis mutandis, Dumpe c. Lettonie (déc.), no 71506/13, CEDH 16 octobre 2018).
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 60946/14

  KUZNETSOVA c. RUSSIE

  La Cour ne voit aucune raison de considérer que la requérante a agi de manière inappropriée lorsqu'elle a choisi de poursuivre cette voie, et le fait que l'intéressée n'a pas engagé une action civile distincte ne saurait être retenu contre elle dans l'appréciation du point de savoir si elle a épuisé les voies de recours internes (Korogodina c. Russie, no 33512/04, § 59, 30 septembre 2010, Elena Cojocaru c. Roumanie, no 74114/12, § 122, 22 mars 2016, et, récemment, Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase, précité, §§ 175-178 ; voir, pour un cas contraire, Dumpe c. Lettonie (déc.), no 71506/13, 16 octobre 2018, où le décès du fils de la requérante a été causé par une multitude de facteurs et où il convenait d'examiner la possibilité d'une responsabilité collective, ce qui dépassait la portée du recours pénal et rendait donc la voie civile plus appropriée).