Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE c. FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Violation de l'art. 6-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 05.10.1990 - 12964/87
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  1 (art. 6-1), that is created by the Court's case-law (see the Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, para. 36).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  I find further support for my opinion in the fact that the Court has already accepted that two of these three basic requirements apply to limitations on "the right of access to a court": I refer to paragraph 57 of the Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985 (Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25), which in this connection laid down the following rule:.
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  It may be noted that precisely the same wording appears in paragraph 194(c) of the Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986 (Series A no. 102, p. 71), which was a judgment of the plenary Court.

 
• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 10522/83

  Mellacher u.a. ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  In the instant case the Court does not have to assess, as such, the French system of classifying administrative acts and the procedure for appealing against them; it must confine its attention as far as possible to the issue raised by the specific case before it (see, among many other authorities, the Mellacher and Others v. Austria judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169, p. 24, para. 41).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  It may be subject to limitations, but these must not restrict or reduce the access left to the individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see, among other authorities, the Philis v. Greece judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 20, para. 59).
• EGMR, 27.11.1991 - 12565/86

  OERLEMANS c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention (see the Court's Oerlemans v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 November 1991, Series A no. 219, pp. 20-21, paras. 47 and 48).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12964/87

  The Court reiterates that Article 26 (art. 26) must be applied with some degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see, among other authorities, the Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, para. 34, and the Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 232, p. 19, para. 27).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 28.03.2019 - C-171/18

  Safeway - Art. 157 AEUV und gleiches Entgelt für männliche und weibliche …

  22 EGMR, Urteil vom 16. Dezember 1992, de la Pradelle/Frankreich (CE:ECHR:1992:1216JUD001296487, § 35).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 21.11.2012 - C-334/12 RX-II

  Réexamen Arango Jaramillo u.a. / EIB

  38 - Vgl. in diesem Sinne u. a. EGMR, Urteile vom 21. Februar 1975, Golder/Vereinigtes Königreich (Serie A Nr. 18, S. 18, §§ 34 und 35), und vom 16. Dezember 1992, Geouffre de la Pradelle/Frankreich (Beschwerde Nr. 12964/87 , Recueil des arrêts et décisions, S. 43, § 34).