Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 29728/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,27615) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VAHTERA v. FINLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.06.1993 - 12914/87
MELIN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 29728/96
By doing so he clearly provided those courts with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 35, namely the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them (see, e.g., the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 27, § 72, and the Saïdi v. France judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261, p. 55, § 40). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 11454/85
KOSTOVSKI v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 29728/96
As a rule, these rights require that an accused should be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either at the time the witness was making his statement or at some later stage of the proceedings (see, e.g., the Kostovski v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166, p. 20, § 41, and the above-mentioned Saïdi judgment, p. 56, § 43). - EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76
GUZZARDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 29728/96
By doing so he clearly provided those courts with the opportunity which is in principle intended to be afforded to Contracting States by Article 35, namely the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them (see, e.g., the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 27, § 72, and the Saïdi v. France judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261, p. 55, § 40).