Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 59304/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98
VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
Relevant domestic provisions regarding the conditions of imprisonment and censorship of correspondence have also been summarised in the Valasinas v. Lithuania (no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 92-97, ECHR 2001) and Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 44800/98, 14.3.2002, § 15-17) judgments.The Court recalls that Article 35 § 1 of the Convention requires to exhaust domestic remedies but that, on the other hand, there is no need to have recourse to remedies which are inadequate (see the Valasinas v. Lithuania decision, no. 44558/98, 14.3.2000).
- EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 47679/99
STASAITIS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
Relevant domestic provisions regarding the applicant's complaints under Article 5 of the Convention have been summarised in the Stasaitis v. Lithuania judgment (no. 47679/99, 21.3.2002, §§ 51-54).The Court notes however that the applicant has not shown that any period of his remand in custody was not covered by reasoned detention orders taken by the competent courts; and that thus his remand was incompatible with domestic law or arbitrary within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) (see, mutatis mutandis, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, 31.7.2000, §§ 65-70, ECHR 2000-IX; also see Stasaitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679/99, 21.3.2002, §§ 55-76).
- EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
The Court notes however that the applicant has not shown that any period of his remand in custody was not covered by reasoned detention orders taken by the competent courts; and that thus his remand was incompatible with domestic law or arbitrary within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) (see, mutatis mutandis, Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, 31.7.2000, §§ 65-70, ECHR 2000-IX; also see Stasaitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679/99, 21.3.2002, §§ 55-76). - EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 44800/98
PUZINAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2003 - 59304/00
Relevant domestic provisions regarding the conditions of imprisonment and censorship of correspondence have also been summarised in the Valasinas v. Lithuania (no. 44558/98, 24.7.2001, §§ 92-97, ECHR 2001) and Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 44800/98, 14.3.2002, § 15-17) judgments.