Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SUPREME HOLY COUNCIL OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 9 No violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Arts. 6 and 14 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 39023/97
• EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 39023/97
• EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

     107.  The Court reiterates, however, that Article 13 does not go so far as to guarantee a remedy allowing a Contracting State's laws as such to be challenged before a national authority on the ground of being contrary to the Convention (see Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) , judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, § 61; Kuda v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 151, ECHR 2000-XI, and Connors v. the United Kingdom , no. 66746/01, § 109, 27 May 2004).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  What is at stake here is the preservation of pluralism and the proper functioning of democracy, one of the principal characteristics of which is the possibility it offers of resolving a country's problems through dialogue, even when they are irksome (see Kokkinakis v. Greece , judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p.18, § 33, Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova , no. 45701/99, § 123 ECHR 2001-XII, and Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria , cited above, § 78).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  Such a remedy must allow the competent domestic authority both to deal with the substance of the relevant Convention complaint and to grant appropriate relief, although Contracting States are afforded some discretion as to the manner in which they discharge their obligations under Article 13. The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Çakc v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 112, ECHR 1999-IV).

 
• EGMR, 08.12.1999 - 23885/94

  FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY PARTY (ÖZDEP) v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

     116.  Having regard to the circumstances of the present case and its case-law concerning claims for non-pecuniary damage made on behalf of legal persons or organisations (see Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey [GC], no. 23885/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-VIII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV, § 35; Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria , nos.
• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 38178/97

  SERIF c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

     76.  According to the Court's case-law, State measures favouring a particular leader or group in a divided religious community or seeking to compel the community, or part of it, to place itself under a single leadership against its will would constitute an infringement of the freedom of religion (see Serif v. Greece , no. 38178/97, §§ 49, 52 and 53, ECHR 1999-IX and Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria , cited above, § 78).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

     116.  Having regard to the circumstances of the present case and its case-law concerning claims for non-pecuniary damage made on behalf of legal persons or organisations (see Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey [GC], no. 23885/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-VIII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV, § 35; Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria , nos.
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96

  HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  The right to freedom of religion under Article 9 , interpreted in the light of Article 11, the provision which safeguards associations against unjustified State interference, encompasses the expectation that the community will be allowed to function peacefully, free from arbitrary State intervention (see Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 62, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 121, ECHR 2001-IX; and Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova , cited above, § 146), the Court considers that an award under this head is appropriate.
• EGMR, 13.12.2001 - 45701/99

  METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  What is at stake here is the preservation of pluralism and the proper functioning of democracy, one of the principal characteristics of which is the possibility it offers of resolving a country's problems through dialogue, even when they are irksome (see Kokkinakis v. Greece , judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p.18, § 33, Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova , no. 45701/99, § 123 ECHR 2001-XII, and Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria , cited above, § 78).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29225/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2004 - 39023/97

  29221/95 and 29225/95, § 121, ECHR 2001-IX; and Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova , cited above, § 146), the Court considers that an award under this head is appropriate.

• BAG, 30.01.2019 - 10 AZR 299/18

  Wirksamkeit eines Kopftuchverbots?

  Konflikte zwischen Gläubigen und Anders- oder Nichtgläubigen sollten nicht im Weg der Beseitigung, sondern unter Bewahrung der religiösen Vielfalt gelöst werden (EGMR 16.  Dezember 2004 - 39023/97 - [Supreme Holy Council of the Muslim Community gegen Bulgarien] Rn. 93) .
• EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 412/03

  HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS …

  The absence of legal personality of the applicant organisation is not an obstacle in this respect (see, in particular, Supreme Holy Council of the Muslim Community v. Bulgaria, no. 39023/97, § 116, 16 December 2004; Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, § 146, ECHR 2001-XII; and Biserica Adevarat Ortodoxa din Moldova and Others v. Moldova, no. 952/03, § 61, 27 February 2007).

  The Court's conclusions in this case come hardly as a surprise after the judgments of the Court in the cases of Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC] (no. 30985/96, ECHR 2000 XI) and of Supreme Holy Council of the Muslim Community v. Bulgaria (no. 39023/97, 16 December 2004), and Resolution 1390 (2004) of PACE in regard of the 2002 Denominations Act.

• EGMR, 22.05.2007 - 412/03

  HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH v. BULGARIA

  The Court reiterates that a Church or ecclesiastical body may, as such, exercise on behalf of its adherents the rights guaranteed by Articles 9 and 11 of the Convention and that registration or legal personality is not a pre-condition for exercising such rights or for filing an application before the Court under Article 34 of the Convention (see Cha"are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-VII, mutatis mutandis, Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, ECHR 2001-IX, Supreme Holy Council of the Muslim Community v. Bulgaria, no. 39023/97, 16 December 2004 and Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99, ECHR 2001-XII).