Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64826) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ELDAR IMANOV AND AZHDAR IMANOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (14)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
Accordingly, the inquiry cannot be said to have been "effective" (see, for similar reasoning, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 78 and 79, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
Consideration was given to the starting of investigations, delays in taking statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV), and the length of time taken during the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
Where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a plausible and convincing explanation of how those injuries were caused (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII, and Ribitsch, cited above, § 34). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia forensic evidence (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96
INDELICATO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
Consideration was given to the starting of investigations, delays in taking statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV), and the length of time taken during the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001). - EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
An obligation to investigate "is not an obligation of result, but of means": not every investigation should necessarily be successful or come to a conclusion which coincides with the claimant's account of events; however, it should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia forensic evidence (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
The question whether the purpose of the treatment was to humiliate or debase the victim is a further factor to be taken into account, but the absence of any such purpose cannot conclusively rule out a finding of a violation of Article 3 (see V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX). - EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 6887/02
In respect of a person deprived of his liberty, any recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 of the Convention (see Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004). - EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05
SARBAN v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01
SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03
TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09
LYAPIN v. RUSSIA
The Court has found in previous cases against Russia concerning serious allegations of ill-treatment at the hands of the police that the belated commencement of the criminal proceedings had resulted in the loss of precious time, which could not but have had a negative impact on the success of the investigation (see Kopylov, cited above, § 137; Eldar Imanov and Azhdar Imanov v. Russia, no. 6887/02, § 99, 16 December 2010; and Shishkin v. Russia, no. 18280/04, § 100, 7 July 2011). - EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 57365/12
ANTON c. ROUMANIE
Par ailleurs, la Cour souligne une nouvelle fois que les allégations de mauvais traitements infligés pendant une garde à vue sont extrêmement difficiles à étayer pour la victime si elle a été isolée du monde extérieur et privée de la possibilité de voir médecins, avocats, parents ou amis, susceptibles de lui fournir un soutien et d'établir les preuves nécessaires (Eldar Imanov et Azhdar Imanov c. Russie, no 6887/02, §§ 88-89, 16 décembre 2010).