Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,39940) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)
Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova
[07.10.2015]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 23755/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
A person charged with an offence must always be released pending trial unless the State can show that there are "relevant and sufficient" reasons to justify the continued detention (YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, § 52, Series A no. 319-A). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
The use of the word "or" does not indicate that prompt trial is an alternative to release (Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, § 4, Series A no. 8; Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, §§ 4-5, Series A no. 7). - EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
In this context, "[a]rguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract"" (Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)).
- EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
The domestic courts "must examine all the facts arguing for or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence, a departure from the rule of respect for individual liberty and set them out in their decisions on the applications for release" (Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, § 35, Series A no. 207). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
The use of the word "or" does not indicate that prompt trial is an alternative to release (Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, § 4, Series A no. 8; Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, §§ 4-5, Series A no. 7). - EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 40896/98
NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
It recalls that it has considered in the past house arrest to constitute "deprivation of liberty" within the meaning of Article 5 of the Convention (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 60, 30 September 2004; Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 63, 28 November 2002 and Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955/98, § 17, ECHR 2001-IX). - EGMR, 28.11.2002 - 58442/00
LAVENTS c. LETTONIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 23755/07
It recalls that it has considered in the past house arrest to constitute "deprivation of liberty" within the meaning of Article 5 of the Convention (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 60, 30 September 2004; Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 63, 28 November 2002 and Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955/98, § 17, ECHR 2001-IX).