Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,39933) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DMITRIJEVS v. LATVIA
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Dmitrijevs v. Latvia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DMITRIJEVS v. LATVIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
- EGMR, 24.10.2018 - 49037/09
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
The Court has established that in proceedings before it there are no procedural barriers to the admissibility of evidence or predetermined formulae for its assessment (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
For a punishment or treatment associated with it to be "inhuman" or "degrading", the suffering or humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment or punishment (see Enea, cited above, § 56, and Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-IX). - EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
McFARLANE v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to preferably prevent the infringement from happening or, alternatively, to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 130/10
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
Under this regime the applicant, albeit still serving his sentence in a closed-type prison, was allowed to stay outside his cell and to enjoy certain other privileges (see "Relevant domestic law" above), in keeping with the rehabilitative aim of imprisonment emphasised in the Court's case-law (see Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, § 115, ECHR 2013 (extracts)). - EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09
The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to preferably prevent the infringement from happening or, alternatively, to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 108, 10 September 2010, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]