Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
  No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3 - Rights of defence Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 50541/08
• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08, 40351/09
• EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 50541/08
• EGMR, 07.06.2017 - 50541/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 24.09.2009 - 7025/04

  PISHCHALNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  But they are not an end in themselves: compliance with the requirements of a fair trial must be examined in each case having regard to the development of the proceedings as a whole, and not on the basis of the isolated consideration of one particular aspect or incident (see Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 64, 24 September 2009. See also Mayzit, cited above, § 77; and Seleznev, cited above, § 67).
• EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 23180/06

  BANDALETOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  The Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275; Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010; and Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180/06, § 54, 31 October 2013).
• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 39846/98

  BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  However, the Court had always recognised that the right to legal assistance could be subject to restrictions for good cause (see John Murray, cited above, § 63; Magee, cited above, § 41; Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-X; and Pishchalnikov, cited above, § 67).

 
• EGMR, 26.06.2008 - 15591/03

  SELEZNEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  Their intrinsic aim is to contribute to ensuring the fairness of the criminal proceedings as a whole (see Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 77, 20 January 2005; and Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591/03, § 67, 26 June 2008).
• EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 36391/02

  Wirksamkeitsverpflichtete Konventionsauslegung; Recht auf konkreten und wirksamen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  The applicants in the present joined cases argued (see paragraph 169 of the judgment) that "the right to legal advice was not merely a protection against coercion and ill-treatment: there was a clear link between the right to legal advice and the right against self-incrimination running through the case-law of the Court both before and after Salduz" (see Salduz v. Turkey ([GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  The Court's primary concern under Article 6 § 1 is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275; Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 84, 16 November 2010; and Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180/06, § 54, 31 October 2013).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 34720/97

  HEANEY ET McGUINNESS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 50541/08

  "Their rationale lies, inter alia, in the protection of the accused against improper compulsion by the authorities, thereby contributing to the avoidance of miscarriages of justice and to the fulfilment of the aims of Article 6. The right not to incriminate oneself, in particular, presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resort to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused (see, inter alia, Saunders v. the United Kingdom [GC], 17 December 1996, § 68, Reports 1996-VI; Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, § 40, ECHR 2000-XII; and the judgment in Jalloh, cited above, § 100).".