Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  S.J.P. AND E.S. v. SWEDEN

  Art. 8, Art. 35 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JOHANSSON PRAKT v. SWEDEN

  Art. 8 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11
• EGMR, 28.08.2018 - 8610/11

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11

  In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11

  Based on this finding and with reference, inter alia, to Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and the Court's case-law under these provisions, in particular the case of Kudla v. Poland ([GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI), the Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation under Swedish law for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.
• EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95

  KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11

  The Supreme Court referred in particular to the judgment in Keenan v. the United Kingdom (no. 27229/95, § 130, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 17381/02

  LEMKE c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11

  In such a case, even if a claim for compensation lodged with the Chancellor of Justice or before the ordinary courts were to be successful, it would not afford sufficient redress to the applicants since it could only result in monetary compensation and not an end to the on-going situation (see, mutatis mutandis, Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 47, ECHR 1999-II; Lemke v. Turkey, no. 17381/02, § 38, 5 June 2007; and Haralambie v. Romania, no. 21737/03, § 73, 27 October 2009).

• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11

  ISAKSSON v. SWEDEN

  Furthermore, a comprehensive summary of the issue of compensation for violations of the Convention in the Swedish legal order can be found in Ruminski v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 10404/10, §§ 14-28, 21 May 2013, Marinkovic v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 43570/10, §§ 18-26, 10 December 2013) and Johansson-Prakt and Salehzade v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 8610/11, §§ 49-60, 16 December 2014).