Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BUDIMIR v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BUDIMIR v. CROATIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 41723/06

  Gillberg ./. Schweden

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  In addition, Article 8 protects the right to personal development and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008; Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012; and Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), with further references therein).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  In addition, Article 8 protects the right to personal development and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008; Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012; and Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), with further references therein).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  In addition, Article 8 protects the right to personal development and the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008; Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 66, 3 April 2012; and Barbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, ECHR 2017 (extracts), with further references therein).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  The purpose of Article 35 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, for example, Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2021 - 44691/14

  In both contexts regard must be had in particular to the fair balance that has to be struck between competing private and public interests, subject in any event to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the State (see Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 62, ECHR 2011, and Barbulescu, cited above, § 112).

• EGMR - 18235/22 (anhängig)

  HINIC v. CROATIA

  Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (cf. Budimir v. Croatia, no. 44691/14, §§ 56-65, 16 December 2021)? How long was the applicant effectively prohibited from working as a bodyguard? Was he dismissed from work and when? Were there other tasks he could have or did perform during the period in which he had been deprived of his professional licence?.