Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16144) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VARAPNICKAITE-MAZYLIENE v. LITHUANIA
Art. 8 MRK
No violation of Art. 8 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Varapnickaite-Mazyliene v. Lithuania
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00
ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05
The confidentiality of medical data should be preserved until it no longer constitutes an overriding interest (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 53, ECHR 2004-IV where the Court found that the protection of a medical secret was no longer justified since not only had some 40, 000 copies of the book revealing medical secrets of former President Mitterrand already been sold, but it had also been disseminated on the Internet and had been the subject of considerable media comment). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05
It is therefore necessary to determine in each case whether the means available to litigants in domestic law are "effective" in the sense either of preventing the alleged violation or its continuation, or of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 98, ECHR 2006-VII). - EGMR, 17.10.1986 - 9532/81
REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05
Furthermore, in striking this balance, the aims mentioned in the second paragraph of Article 8 may be of a certain relevance (see Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, § 37, Series A no. 106). - EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88
OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05
In this context the Court emphasises the duty of the press to impart information and ideas on matters of public interest (see, among many authorities, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216). - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05
The Court recalls that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which includes, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B).