Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 5-1 Violation de l'art. 5-4 Violation de l'art. 5-5 Violation de l'art. 3 (volet matériel) Violation de l'art. 13+3 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STANEV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+3, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 5-1 Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 5-5 Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 13+3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STANEV v. BULGARIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Violation of Article 5 ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
• institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

  Stanev gegen Bulgarien

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 29.06.2010 - 36760/06
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
• EGMR - 36760/06

Wird zitiert von ... (264)Neu Zitiert selbst (32)

• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  In this connection, the question whether such treatment was intended to humiliate or debase the victim is a factor to be taken into account, although the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67, 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  As regards the deprivation of liberty of mentally disordered persons, an individual cannot be deprived of his liberty as being of "unsound mind" unless the following three minimum conditions are satisfied: firstly, he must reliably be shown to be of unsound mind; secondly, the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; thirdly, the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33; Shtukaturov, cited above, § 114; and Varbanov, cited above, § 45).
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; and Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I).

 
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 90, ECHR 2000-XI, and Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 130, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84

  CIULLA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  In this connection, the effective enjoyment of the right to compensation guaranteed by Article 5 § 5 must be ensured with a sufficient degree of certainty (see Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, § 44, Series A no. 148; Sakık and Others v. Turkey, 26 November 1997, § 60, Reports 1997-VII; and N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 49, ECHR 2002-X).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (ibid.; see also, among many other authorities, Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877/98, § 54, ECHR 2003-I, and the recapitulation of the relevant principles in Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 65, Series A no. 294-B).
• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  This "right to a court", of which the right of access is an aspect, may be relied on by anyone who considers on arguable grounds that an interference with the exercise of his or her civil rights is unlawful and complains that no possibility was afforded to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 117, ECHR 2005-X, and Salontaji-Drobnjak v. Serbia, no. 36500/05, § 132, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 secures to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his or her civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99

  Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  In this connection, the question whether such treatment was intended to humiliate or debase the victim is a factor to be taken into account, although the absence of any such purpose does not inevitably lead to a finding that there has been no violation of Article 3 (see Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67, 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III, and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 95, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 90, ECHR 2000-XI, and Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 130, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
• EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82

  SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91

  KAMPANIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9787/82

  WEEKS c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 23.02.1984 - 9019/80

  LUBERTI v. ITALY
• EGMR, 18.05.2000 - 41488/98

  VELIKOVA c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 50390/99

  McGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83

  HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 28.11.1988 - 10929/84

  NIELSEN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 44009/05

  SHTUKATUROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 39187/98

  H.M. v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 61603/00

  Konventionskonforme Auslegung des deutschen (Zivil-)Rechts …
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96

  VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

• EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 10211/12

  Sicherungsverwahrung für deutschen Sexualmörder gebilligt

  Insbesondere sei sie nicht nach Artikel 5 Abs. 1 Buchstabe e als Freiheitsentziehung bei einem "psychisch Kranken" gemäß der vom Gerichtshof vorgenommen Auslegung dieser Bestimmung gerechtfertigt (er bezog sich auf die Rechtssachen Winterwerp./. Niederlande, 24. Oktober 1979, Rdnr. 39, Serie A Band 33, und Stanev./. Bulgarien [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 36760/06, Rdnr. 145, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …

  The Court reiterates that in order to find a violation of Article 5 § 5, it must be established that the finding of a violation of one of the other paragraphs of Article 5 could not give rise to an enforceable claim for compensation before the domestic courts (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 184, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 47287/15

  Ungarn wegen Inhaftierung von Flüchtlingen verurteilt

  However, there is an inevitable element of suffering and humiliation involved in custodial measures, and this as such, in itself, will not entail a violation of Article 3 (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 204, ECHR 2012).

 
• EGMR, 07.01.2016 - 23279/14

  Therapieunterbringung (Sicherungsverwahrung) bei schwerer psychischer Störung …

  An individual cannot be deprived of his liberty as being of 'unsound mind" unless the following three minimum conditions are satisfied: firstly, he must reliably be shown to be of unsound mind, that is, a true mental disorder must be established before a competent authority on the basis of objective medical expertise; secondly, the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; thirdly, the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see Winterwerp, cited above, § 39, and Stanev v. Bulgaria (GC), no. 36760/06, § 145, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  DE TOMMASO v. ITALY

  39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 57, ECHR 2012; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 115, ECHR 2012; and Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 73, ECHR 2010).

  Ibid., §§ 92-93; see also Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 225, ECHR 2012; Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 57, ECHR 2012; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 115, ECHR 2012; and Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 73, ECHR 2010.

• EGMR, 15.11.2018 - 29580/12

  Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny

  However, with a view to helping the respondent State in that task, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see, among other authorities, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 254-55, ECHR 2012; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 158, ECHR 2014; and Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 149, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Recht auf Beschwerde; Verhältnis zwischen …

  39692/09, 40713/09 and 41008/09, § 57, 15 March 2012; Stanev v. Bulgaria (GC), no. 36760/06, § 115, 17 January 2012; Medvedyev and Others v. France (GC), no. 3394/03, § 73, ECHR 2010; Guzzardi, cited above, §§ 92-93; Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 71, ECHR 2005-V; and Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 59, Series A no. 22).
• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12

  Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 99, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 926/08

  KARELIN v. RUSSIA

  With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, 17 January 2012; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, ECHR 2009; and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 14305/17

  Menschenrechtsgerichtshof fordert Freilassung von Selahattin Demirtas

  It has also found that the detention of an individual is such a serious measure that it is only justified where other, less severe measures have been considered and found to be insufficient to safeguard the individual or public interest which might require that the person concerned be detained (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 143, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12

  Lampedusa-Haft war illegal
• EGMR, 31.01.2019 - 18052/11

  Belgien verurteilt: Vergewaltiger jahrelang nicht auf Deutsch therapiert
• EGMR, 21.10.2013 - 42750/09

  Spanien muss Eta-Attentäterin freilassen
• EGMR, 21.10.2013 - 55508/07

  Massaker von Katyn
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
• EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 38958/16

  W.A. v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

  Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben
• EGMR, 08.11.2021 - 49868/19

  DOLINSKA-FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 12427/22

  A.D. v. MALTA
• EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 14305/17

  Selahattin Demirtas
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 41872/10

  M.A. c. CHYPRE
• EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 1760/15

  T.B. c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 18255/10

  TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 54381/08

  TSVETKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 51357/07

  NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
• EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 11537/11

  LORENZ v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 12.05.2017 - 21980/04

  SIMEONOVI c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 14988/09

  Homosexuellen-Kundgebungen verboten: Russland erneut verurteilt
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 6281/13

  Verurteilte Gewalttäter: Regeln zur Sicherungsverwahrung bestätigt
• EuGH, 19.09.2019 - C-467/18

  Rayonna prokuratura Lom
• EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 1469/20

  ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
• EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 1967/14

  HILLER v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 47152/06

  BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 15018/11

  HARAKCHIEV AND TOLUMOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 13.06.2019 - 77633/16

  MARCELLO VIOLA c. ITALIE (N° 2)
• EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31199/12

  K.C. v. POLAND
• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 42523/16

  NAGABAS AND KARPENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 72126/14

  CEESAY v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 19.02.2015 - 75450/12

  M.S. v. CROATIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 15.02.2022 - 26081/17

  ANATOLIY MARINOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 35751/20

  BAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 77850/12

  NAWROT v. POLAND
• EGMR, 29.11.2016 - 76943/11

  PAROISSE GRÉCO-CATHOLIQUE LUPENI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 34806/04

  X v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 73548/13

  W.D. c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 44898/10

  JERONOVICS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 31039/11

  NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.07.2021 - 19699/18

  AKGÜN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 05.04.2018 - 40160/12

  ZUBAC c. CROATIE
• EGMR, 02.05.2019 - 50956/16

  PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.05.2014 - C-146/14

  Mahdi
• EGMR, 10.01.2013 - 43418/09

  CLAES c. BELGIQUE
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 23.03.2023 - C-209/22

  Rayonna prokuratura Lovech, TO Lukovit (Fouille corporelle) - Vorlage zur …
• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  PLESHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 69444/17

  ROTH c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 20.04.2021 - 66152/14

  KUZMINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 7949/11

  L.D. ET P.K. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 06.10.2016 - 55594/13

  W.P. v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 7472/14

  D.L. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12

  M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA
• VG Freiburg, 21.07.2020 - A 15 K 2291/17

  Abschiebungsschutz Afghanistan; Auswirkungen der Corona-Krise
• EGMR, 09.01.2024 - 30138/21

  MIRANDA MAGRO v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 46130/14

  VENKEN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 32325/13

  MAFALANI v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 73593/10

  LÁSZLÓ MAGYAR v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 40908/05

  FAZLIYSKI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03

  PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2021 - 62819/17

  DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM
• EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 56665/09

  KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.06.2012 - C-245/11

  K - Verordnung (EG) Nr. 343/2003 - Bestimmung des Mitgliedstaats, der für die …
• EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 8530/08

  VOLINTIRU c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 29999/04

  MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.05.2022 - 208/18

  U-Haft für türkischen Amnesty-Chef war rechtswidrig
• EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 67696/11

  ADEM SERKAN GÜNDOGDU c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 17280/08

  A.N. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 13431/07

  FRANCESCO QUATTRONE c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42337/12

  SUSO MUSA v. MALTA
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 48762/19

  BIELINSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 09.06.2022 - 15567/20

  XAVIER LUCAS c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 25658/19

  BANEVI c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 30044/10

  DIMO DIMOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 21.01.2020 - 34602/16

  STRAZIMIRI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 12.03.2019 - 41216/13

  PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 25057/11

  CALIN ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 3503/08

  ÜNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 48883/07

  MATHLOOM c. GRECE
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 44101/18

  PLAZZI c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 28/17

  DE SOUSA c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 49083/18

  COLIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 28143/10

  MAKSIM SAVOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 14156/07

  HAKOBYAN AND AMIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 21571/05

  MINDADZE AND NEMSITSVERIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 71545/11

  IVAN TODOROV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 31517/12

  MIESSEN c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 55949/13

  HERACLES S.A. GENERAL CEMENT COMPANY c. GRÈCE
• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12

  S.Z. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 32863/05

  L.M. v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 71723/10

  SÂNCRAIAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 56862/15

  TONCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 09.12.2021 - 56138/16

  JARRAND c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 4633/15

  G.B. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 62819/17

  DENIS ET IRVINE c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 47145/14

  MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 36184/13

  KRISTIANA LTD. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 57722/12

  GRABOWSKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 76943/11

  PAROISSE GRÉCO-CATHOLIQUE LUPENI ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 56637/10

  SOCIEDADE DE CONSTRUCOES MARTINS AND VIEIRA, LDA v. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 11577/06

  M.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 64791/10

  M.D. AND OTHERS v. MALTA
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 61737/08

  DARESKIZB LTD v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 48345/12

  KANDARAKIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 11436/06

  MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 42399/13

  IGRANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 29729/09

  KHAYRULLINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07

  LENEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2022 - 10425/19

  P.W. v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 41970/11

  SHCHERBINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 25119/09

  JAMES, WELLS AND LEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 19062/15

  POGORYELOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 14727/11

  N.T. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.10.2017 - 23022/13

  D.M.D. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 57148/08

  MIRYANA PETROVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 12019/08

  RAIHANI c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 7963/05

  IVAN STOYANOV VASILEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 33117/02

  LASHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 31360/10

  TARBUK v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 22883/05

  CRISTIAN TEODORESCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 54408/20

  OPREA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 11423/19

  GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 13610/12

  VARDAN MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 30.03.2021 - 82087/17

  D.C. c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 26744/16

  KORBAN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.12.2018 - 21497/14

  WITKOWSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 62377/16

  DELIN v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 21786/15

  LAKATOS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY v.
• EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 37075/14

  BRAGADIREANU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 62507/12

  CERVENKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 23257/04

  FALIE v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09

  ATIMAN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 16.09.2014 - 50131/08

  ATUDOREI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 18938/07

  RADKOV AND SABEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 24086/03

  RAUDEVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 5543/06

  STELIAN ROSCA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 02.05.2013 - 25498/08

  KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 35939/10

  MIHAILOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 10.01.2013 - 43653/09

  DUFOORT c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 45026/07

  KEDZIOR v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 31012/19

  BAKOYANNI v. GREECE
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11227/21

  BJERG v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 41836/19

  SUTA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 70139/14

  I.G.D. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 08.02.2022 - 5471/14

  AMARIKYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 35211/08

  KOÇ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12254/20

  YAYGIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 26947/09

  MURADU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 50705/13

  DEDESH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 32349/16

  VUJNOVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 10252/10

  BASOK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 26553/08

  GURBANOVA AND PASHAYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 28932/14

  HODZIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 63507/11

  GOREA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 72238/14

  COTET v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 52241/14

  VASILEVSKIY AND BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 691/15

  D.R. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 68747/11

  ZACHOULIS v. GREECE
• EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 8685/15

  V.S. v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 27473/06

  MUSTAFA SEZGIN TANRIKULU v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 46248/07

  SHESTOPALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.11.2016 - 24037/08

  LELYUK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 28472/08

  I.N. v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 50494/12

  YENGO c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 25820/07

  STEFAN STANKOV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 26.02.2015 - 45797/09

  ZAICHENKO v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 43368/08

  PAPILLO c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09

  O.G. v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  KIM v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 13959/06

  BIÇER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.05.2013 - 49069/11

  NATALIYA MIKHAYLENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 22.11.2012 - 23419/07

  SÝKORA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 13472/06

  LIUIZA v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 37568/09

  RHAZALI ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 22515/14

  BRYAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 37474/20

  BESNIK CANI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 2809/18

  KAGANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 42296/09

  KOVROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.10.2021 - 35402/14

  R.D. ET I.M.D. c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 69168/17

  SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 18060/13

  DERGACHENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.12.2020 - 56751/16

  SHIKSAITOV v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 27768/17

  GUNNARSSON v. ICELAND
• EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 25945/12

  TKACZUK c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 24.03.2020 - 69912/14

  GERTER c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 23.01.2020 - 38067/15

  L.R. v. NORTH MACEDONIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 17670/18

  DAVIDOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 22289/08

  BEREZOVSKIYE v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 6194/13

  JIANG ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 19.02.2019 - 25253/08

  RUSEN BAYAR v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.10.2018 - 65379/13

  PAROL c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 17181/09

  LESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 39783/15

  BORG v. MALTA
• EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  SAMARDZIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 74568/11

  WRONA v. POLAND
• EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 41509/06

  STADNIK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.01.2017 - 72936/14

  I.P. c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14594/07

  BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 3427/13

  HADZIMEJLIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
• EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 49861/12

  VANDER VELDE ET SOUSSI c. BELGIQUE ET PAYS-BAS
• EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 49484/11

  SMITS ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 22443/05

  GÜLAY COSKUN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 38068/08

  PUCE v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 50264/08

  ANATOLIY RUDENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 35807/05

  CHOSTA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 3276/10

  SHMUSHKOVYCH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 32357/09

  JUNCAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 27.06.2013 - 9096/09

  ABASHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 25769/02

  IVANOVAS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 13837/07

  S.R. v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR - 34646/06

  ZHAKIYANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR - 23668/22 (anhängig)

  STAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 36250/12

  SLAVKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 31239/11

  RASHID v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 40132/16

  SALMANOV v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 63106/12

  NORIK POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 18.06.2020 - 42779/12

  NUR AHMED AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 61582/10

  SOLODNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 54839/17

  MADZAROVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
• EGMR, 28.01.2020 - 39070/08

  ATAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 36391/16

  PORCHET c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 14.05.2019 - 7335/09

  ORLOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 8394/13

  KLACANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 26293/18

  AZYUKOVSKA v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 5406/07

  KRIVOLAPOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 50650/16

  SHAKIRZYANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2018 - 59465/12

  VOROSHILOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 62798/09

  ARTUR IVANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 47889/08

  VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 38372/13

  ALIVORYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 73590/14

  TSEZAR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 06.02.2018 - 76186/11

  CHESSA c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 09.03.2017 - 49526/07

  KUZMENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 32013/07

  POPOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 40025/10

  LAGUNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.09.2015 - 56668/12

  KORPACHYOVA-HOFBAUER v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 44183/12

  BÄCKER v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 55910/09

  IPEK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 19400/11

  R.R. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 27843/11

  NIYAZOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 24527/08

  M.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 61431/15

  SHANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 08.06.2021 - 32812/13

  MADEROVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 75378/13

  M.T. v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 40151/14

  TARKHANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 79653/12

  MUIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 27793/08

  LOPUSHANSKYY v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 23.08.2016 - 11756/11

  BRLJACIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 15753/12

  KALISZ v. POLAND
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 48729/16

  LINCAR v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 11230/08

  SALMIN AND BESKISHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 26341/11

  S.O.S. RACISME - TOUCHE PAS À MON POTE c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 6752/13

  O.G. v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 21056/08

  MARTIKÁN v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 16502/09

  LOYKA v. SLOVAKIA