Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PLESO v. HUNGARY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 41242/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  In particular, the obligations of a Contracting Party under the Convention can be violated by any person exercising an official function vested in him (see Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 46, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  In sum, the applicant's position was that the notion of "dangerousness" in domestic law could not have been substituted for by considerations about his unconventional lifestyle, partial insight of his condition or unwillingness to subject himself to hospitalisation - especially because the authorities could have availed themselves of less stringent measures, such as outpatient care or prolonged observation (cf. Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96

  VARBANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  The applicant submitted that he had not been "reliably shown to be a person of unsound mind" for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention (cf. Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 45, ECHR 2000-X).

 
• EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 41537/02

  GREGORIO DE ANDRADE c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  By not doing so in good time, that is, before the expiry of the relevant time-limit, he effectively deprived the applicant of the possibility to pursue a remedy (see Gregório de Andrade v. Portugal, no. 41537/02, § 41, 14 November 2006), whereas the Government based their objection on this very omission.
• EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 24240/94

  BOCSI v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  They argued that even if this had been explained by an omission of the guardian ad litem, nothing had prevented the applicant from instructing his lawyer, retained on 22 April 2008, to file a petition (see, mutatis mutandis, Bocsi v. Hungary, no. 24240/94, Commission decision of 21 May 1998).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 41242/08

  The deprivation of liberty of a person of unsound mind within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention was justified if he was reliably shown to be of unsound mind and the mental disorder was of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement (see e.g. Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33).